cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
398
Views
0
Helpful
0
Replies

Layer 3 Port-Channel with a Layer 2 Subinterface - ASR1001-x to 6807 VSS

nw-team01
Level 1
Level 1
I have a curious Problem.
I have a ASR1001-x that i wan't to redundantly connect to a VSS pair on 6807's. So use a Port-channel, right? So far so good.
Config from Router:
interface Port-channel1
ip address 10.160.1.106 255.255.255.252
 
interface Port-channel1.980
encapsulation dot1Q 980
ip address 10.160.1.98 255.255.255.248
interface TenGigabitEthernet0/0/0
no ip address
channel-group 1 mode active
interface TenGigabitEthernet0/0/1
no ip address
channel-group 1 mode active
Config from VSS:
interface Port-channel240
no switchport
ip address 10.160.1.105 255.255.255.252
 
interface Port-channel240.980
encapsulation dot1Q 980
ip address 10.160.1.99 255.255.255.248
 
interface Vlan980
ip address 10.160.1.97 255.255.255.248 -> this is for testing only
 
interface TenGigabitEthernet1/1/30
no switchport
no ip address
channel-group 240 mode passive
 
interface TenGigabitEthernet2/1/30
no switchport
no ip address
channel-group 240 mode passive
Remotely L2 connected to vlan 980 the other ASR1001-x
ip address 10.160.1.100 255.255.255.248
From VSS ping to 10.160.1.106 and 10.160.1.98 is successful.
From the ASR ping to 10.160.1.105 and 10.160.1.99 is sucessfull. ping to 10.160.1.97 and 10.160.1.98 is unsuccessful.
From the other remotly connected via L2 on vlan 980:
ping to 10.160.1.97 is successful. ping to 10.160.1.98 is successful.
So what i have is that the ASR and the VSS can only communicate Point-to-Point but not across an L2 connection or a SVI.

Any help is appreciated.

0 Replies 0
Review Cisco Networking for a $25 gift card