cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
2495
Views
0
Helpful
1
Replies

MPLS Network and Ethernet Jumbo Frame Questions

beitland
Cisco Employee
Cisco Employee

Hello Experts, 

I have a customer that would like a L2 VPN pseudowire between his two sites. He also states that jumbo frames are a requirement as well and I expect to receive jumbo frames from the customer attachment circuit. However, all of my MPLS backbone circuits were designed for a three label deep system mtu = 1534. It is my understanding that if I enable jumbo frames on the attachment circuit to my customer and indeed receive a jumbo frame, when the PE routers tries to label switch it out across its back bone link(s) towards the remote site, given the back bone link system mtu= 1534, the ethernet frame cannot be fragmented and will be dropped as a result. Q1: Is this correct?

Q2:  If all of the devices in the MPLS network CAN support jumbo frames, is there *** ANY *** disadvantage (or any reason NOT) to enable jumbo frames throughout the MPLS network as a general rule? The only thing that I can come up with is the possibility of buffer exhaustion or having to tune buffers given all the frames are now 9k+ in size vice the default 1518 bytes. Any insights, comments or recommendations would be much appreciated.

Thank you,

Brett

1 Reply 1

rais
Level 7
Level 7

If Ethernet in the network is GE or above then it can support MTU size of 9000 bytes.

Fragmentation should be supported on the router for PW but MTU-management is a better route:

http://www.rfc-base.org/txt/rfc-4623.txt

HTH.

Review Cisco Networking products for a $25 gift card