12-05-2006 03:24 PM - edited 03-03-2019 02:56 PM
I have a 2600 router, with 2 ATM/ADSL dialer interfaces, in production.
I am adding a new ethernet card to the 2600, and will move all upstream traffic from the ADSL lines to a
the new ethernet link.
Currently, NAT is running, with the Dialer interfaces as "Outside" interfaces, and ethernet 0/0 as the inside interface
I will shut down the ATM interfaces, and remove NAT statements from Dialer1 and Dialer 0;
Since I am using a NAT pool with the current dialer interfaces, will I simply move the "ip NAT Outside" to the new ethernet
interface, or will other steps be required ?
-----------------------------
interface ATM0/0
interface ATM0/1
interface Ethernet0/0
ip address 172.16.1.1 255.255.0.0
ip nat inside
interface Ethernet 1/0
description New Ethernet upstream link
ip address 192.168.142.9 255.255.255.248
????? ip nat outside
interface Dialer0
no ip nat outside
shutdown
!
interface Dialer1
no ip nat outside
shutdown
!
ip nat pool NAT 192.168.132.107 192.168.132.110 netmask 255.255.255.248
ip nat inside source list 1 pool NAT overload
ip nat inside source static 172.16.1.2 192.168.132.105
12-05-2006 04:21 PM
the access-list
access-list 1 permit 172.16.0.0 0.0.255.255
12-05-2006 05:17 PM
Yes, move the nat outside command to the correct interface and ensure the nat pool will work w/ new Ethernet address is fine. i.e. confirm the nat pool will not conflict w/ the remote side address ?
Hope this helps.
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide