11-16-2017 08:39 AM - edited 03-05-2019 09:30 AM
Hi Guys,
We have a scenario where we have 2 x Nexus 3548 Switches that are peered together and are working fine.
Recently we had the need to start running OSPF between them and the firewalls, but i am not qutie sure if i had it setup correctly. Each Firewall is connected to 1 of the Nexus Switches.
Adjentcy is forming fine, but the problem is that on each OSPF instance, the nexus switches are forming adjentcy between them as well.
My question is this normal, or is there a spesific way to configure Nexus Switches for OSPF?
For an example:
N3K-SW1
interface Vlan2
no shutdown
ip address 10.10.2.101/24
ip router ospf 254 area 0.0.0.254
hsrp version 2
hsrp 2
preempt
priority 120
ip 10.10.2.1
router ospf 254
router-id 10.10.2.101
OSPF Process ID 254 VRF default
Total number of neighbors: 2
Neighbor ID Pri State Up Time Address Interface
10.10.2.2 1 FULL/DR 00:20:00 10.10.2.2 Vlan2
10.10.2.102 1 FULL/BDR 00:20:04 10.10.2.102 Vlan2
N3K-SW2
interface Vlan2
no shutdown
ip address 10.10.2.102/24
ip router ospf 254 area 0.0.0.254
hsrp version 2
hsrp 2
preempt
priority 90
ip 10.10.2.1
router ospf 254
router-id 10.10.2.102
OSPF Process ID 254 VRF default
Total number of neighbors: 2
Neighbor ID Pri State Up Time Address Interface
10.10.2.2 1 FULL/DR 00:19:34 10.10.2.2 Vlan2
10.10.2.101 1 FULL/DROTHER 00:19:31 10.10.2.101 Vlan2
The same scenario is happening with EIGRP if i try to set up adjaceny with a 6880X VSS;
N3K-SW1
interface Vlan999
no shutdown
ip address 172.16.99.31/24
ip router eigrp 172
hsrp version 2
hsrp 99
preempt
priority 120
ip 172.16.99.33
IP-EIGRP neighbors for process 172 VRF default
H Address Interface Hold Uptime SRTT RTO Q Seq
(sec) (ms) Cnt Num
1 172.16.99.1 Vlan999 13 6w5d 6 200 0 1881
0 172.16.99.32 Vlan999 11 19w0d 1 200 0 12632339
N3K-SW2
interface Vlan999
no shutdown
ip address 172.16.99.32/24
ip router eigrp 172
hsrp version 2
hsrp 99
preempt
priority 80
ip 172.16.99.33
IP-EIGRP neighbors for process 172 VRF default
H Address Interface Hold Uptime SRTT RTO Q Seq
(sec) (ms) Cnt Num
1 172.16.99.1 Vlan999 10 2w5d 6 200 0 1881
0 172.16.99.31 Vlan999 13 19w0d 1 200 0 12722311
Thank you in advance,
Niko
01-11-2019 02:58 AM
01-11-2019 06:56 AM
Hello
Just like to add you maybe be applicable to use Point-to-multipoint non-broadcast network type depending if the layer 3 interface is a SVI
01-11-2019 08:00 AM
Perhaps we can get some clarification from the original poster. I am not sure that there is a problem that needs to be fixed. In reading the original post it seems to me that the key question is this
My question is this normal
If I am understanding the original post correctly there are 2 switches that are connected in at least 1 vlan and operating independently. These switches are connected to 2 firewalls. And when a routing protocol is configured on the vlan/subnet connecting the switches to the firewalls then the switches become neighbors. From my perspective that is a normal behavior and not something that needs to be fixed. If there is something I am not understanding correctly then I hope that the original poster will provide clarification.
HTH
Rick
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide