01-09-2022 07:27 PM - last edited on 01-11-2022 10:45 AM by Translator
Hello EXPERTS,
I have configured EIGRP 100 on HEAD-OFFICE and BRANCH-1 but no neighborship is formed. OR i haven't understood the routing properly, if so, please make me clear. I will be very thankful to you guys!!.
Topology is attached below.
no any config shoud be applied on ISP side.
CONFIGURATION
ISP-INTERNET:
version 15.1
no service timestamps log datetime msec
no service timestamps debug datetime msec
no service password-encryption
!
hostname Router
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
ip cef
no ipv6 cef
!
!
!
!
license udi pid CISCO2911/K9 sn FTX15245A44-
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
spanning-tree mode pvst
!
!
!
!
!
!
interface GigabitEthernet0/0
no ip address
duplex auto
speed auto
shutdown
!
interface GigabitEthernet0/1
no ip address
duplex auto
speed auto
shutdown
!
interface GigabitEthernet0/2
no ip address
duplex auto
speed auto
shutdown
!
interface Serial0/3/0
ip address 1.1.1.2 255.255.255.252
clock rate 2000000
!
interface Serial0/3/1
ip address 2.2.2.2 255.255.255.252
clock rate 2000000
!
interface Vlan1
no ip address
shutdown
!
ip classless
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 2.2.2.1
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 1.1.1.1
!
ip flow-export version 9
!
!
!
no cdp run
!
!
!
!
!
!
line con 0
!
line aux 0
!
line vty 0 4
login
!
!
!
end
HEAD-OFFICE:
!
version 15.1
no service timestamps log datetime msec
no service timestamps debug datetime msec
no service password-encryption
!
hostname HEAD-OFFICE
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
no ip cef
no ipv6 cef
!
!
!
!
license udi pid CISCO2911/K9 sn FTX1524JH3H-
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
spanning-tree mode pvst
!
!
!
!
!
!
interface GigabitEthernet0/0
ip address 192.168.10.1 255.255.255.0
duplex auto
speed auto
!
interface GigabitEthernet0/1
ip address 192.168.20.1 255.255.255.0
duplex auto
speed auto
!
interface GigabitEthernet0/2
ip address 192.168.50.1 255.255.255.0
duplex auto
speed auto
!
interface Serial0/3/0
ip address 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.252
!
interface Serial0/3/1
no ip address
clock rate 2000000
shutdown
!
interface Vlan1
no ip address
shutdown
!
router eigrp 100
network 192.168.10.0
network 192.168.20.0
network 1.1.1.0 0.0.0.3
network 192.168.50.0
!
ip classless
!
ip flow-export version 9
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
line con 0
!
line aux 0
!
line vty 0 4
login
!
!
!
end
BRANCH-1:
Current configuration : 1226 bytes
!
version 15.1
no service timestamps log datetime msec
no service timestamps debug datetime msec
no service password-encryption
!
hostname BRANCH-1
!
!
!
enable secret 5 $1$mERr$aI/DxI917YEQARn3zkBDJ0
!
!
!
!
!
aaa new-model
!
aaa authentication login default group radius local
!
!
!
aaa accounting exec default start-stop group radius
!
!
!
!
ip cef
no ipv6 cef
!
!
!
!
license udi pid CISCO2911/K9 sn FTX1524NG67-
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
ip ssh version 2
ip domain-name cisco.com
!
!
spanning-tree mode pvst
!
!
!
!
!
!
interface GigabitEthernet0/0
ip address 192.168.30.1 255.255.255.0
duplex auto
speed auto
!
interface GigabitEthernet0/1
no ip address
duplex auto
speed auto
shutdown
!
interface GigabitEthernet0/2
no ip address
duplex auto
speed auto
shutdown
!
interface Serial0/3/0
no ip address
clock rate 2000000
shutdown
!
interface Serial0/3/1
ip address 2.2.2.1 255.255.255.252
!
interface Vlan1
no ip address
shutdown
!
router eigrp 100
network 192.168.30.0
network 2.2.2.0 0.0.0.3
!
ip classless
!
ip flow-export version 9
!
!
!
!
radius-server host 192.168.20.2 auth-port 1645 key i@mradius
!
!
!
!
line con 0
!
line aux 0
!
line vty 0 4
line vty 5 10
login authentication default
!
!
!
end
Solved! Go to Solution.
01-10-2022 06:12 AM
Hello,
--> I am doing this lab on my own
Are you following any instructions at all, or did you come up with the topology (and subsequent question) by yourself ? We are under the assumption that you are following a scripted lab. If that is not the case, the answer is simply: no, it won't work. As @paul driver mentioned, you need a common subnet between EIGRP neighbors.
01-10-2022 06:42 AM
Hello @prabinchand ,
a point to point GRE tunnel is enough because you have only one HQ router and one Branch.
You will run EIGRP over the internal subnet in the p2p GRE tunnel
Hope to help
Giuseppe
01-10-2022 09:19 AM
The original poster has created a set of mutually contradictory requirements. The Head Office knows 3 connected LAN subnets and a potential transit network over the serial interface. But it has no other routing knowledge. The Branch knows 1 connected LAN subnet and a potential transit network over the serial interface. So both the Head Office and the Branch know locally connected subnets but have no routing logic for anything remote. And the other condition is:
Condition is no any static route shoud be used on BRANCH and HEAD-OFFICE.
Given this requirement there is no way for this project to work.
For this project to work either the ISP router needs additional routing information, in particular if the ISP router would run EIGRP with the other 2 routers it would be successful. Or if the Head Office and Branch had some default route it would be successful. Or if the Head Office and the Branch had a route for the transit network of the other side it would work. But with the current restrictions I do not see any way that it could work.
01-09-2022 11:57 PM
Hello,
what are the requirements ? If your ISP router is not running EIGRP, the only way for the head and branch routers to form a neighborship is by configuring e.g. DMVPN.
01-10-2022 01:31 AM
How can BRANCH communicate with HEAD-OFFICE if it doesn't knows the route.
Condition is no any static route shoud be used on BRANCH and HEAD-OFFICE.
01-10-2022 01:44 AM
Hello,
what is the full project ? Post the full requirements.
01-10-2022 04:46 AM
REQUIREMENTS:
head office & branch should not use static route instead it should be EIGRP for routing. This is the main requirement of this project.
But i am wondered, if branch dont know the network 1.1.1.0/32 and vice-verse, how it could communicate using dmvpn ?
01-10-2022 04:55 AM - last edited on 01-11-2022 11:15 AM by Translator
Hello,
post your "zipped Packet Tracer project (.pkt) file". Maybe there is a way to use a tunnel, without requiring static routes.
01-10-2022 05:19 AM
01-10-2022 05:30 AM
Hello,
this is a different topology than the one you originally described. Are you sure you sent the correct file ?
01-10-2022 05:33 AM
yes sir, this is correct file. ONLY THE CHANGE IS TUNNEL INTERFACE has been configured as per other EXPERTS suggestions.
01-10-2022 05:56 AM
The file you sent has no ISP router, just a switch. The original file had an ISP router in the middle.
01-10-2022 06:52 AM
01-10-2022 06:42 AM
Hello @prabinchand ,
a point to point GRE tunnel is enough because you have only one HQ router and one Branch.
You will run EIGRP over the internal subnet in the p2p GRE tunnel
Hope to help
Giuseppe
01-10-2022 06:55 AM
yes, GRE is possible in p2p but what is there is no p2p , isp provided 2 networks for HEAD OFFICE AND BRANCH.
what should i do, when 2 networks are not in same subnet and cannot use static routes between them, only option is EIGRP.
In that case what should i do ???
GRE will not work until it finds its path to reach it's other end.
01-10-2022 04:47 AM
I am wondered, if branch dont know the network 1.1.1.0/32 and vice-verse, how it could communicate using dmvpn ?
01-10-2022 12:12 AM
Hello
for eigrp adjacency to form the rtrs need to share a common subnet and in your post this doesn’t seem to be the case!
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide