04-13-2006 10:17 AM - edited 03-03-2019 12:24 PM
Hey Everyone,
I have 4 T1s which I am load balancing via ip cef per destination. That seems to be working for for my receiving, but my transfer does not seem to be load balancing. Please see my "sh int sum" below:
nterface IHQ IQD OHQ OQD RXBS RXPS TXBS TXPS TRTL
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* FastEthernet0/0 0 0 0 0 254000 434 5604000 478 0
FastEthernet0/1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
* Serial0/1/0:0 0 0 0 0 1409000 125 0 0 0
* Serial0/2/0:0 0 0 0 0 1411000 125 0 0 0
* Serial0/3/0:0 0 0 0 0 1407000 125 215000 430 0
* Serial0/3/1:0 0 0 0 0 1407000 125 1000 4 0
Is there anyway I can load balance my outbound traffic?
Thank you,
Scott
04-13-2006 04:38 PM
Scott,
Are you using a default static route to each of the 4 serial interfaces? If so, could you provide us with a "show ip cef 0.0.0.0" internal.
Thanks,
04-14-2006 05:26 AM
Yes, I am using a default route to each...please see ip cef below:
#show ip cef 0.0.0.0 internal
0.0.0.0/32, version 1, epoch 0, receive
Thank you.
04-14-2006 06:27 AM
Sorry, the command should have been "show ip cef 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 internal".
Thanks,
04-14-2006 07:11 AM
Here you go...
#show ip cef 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 internal
0.0.0.0/0, version 89, epoch 0, per-destination sharing
0 packets, 0 bytes
via xxx.xxx.xxx.1, 0 dependencies, recursive
traffic share 1
next hop xxx.xxx.xxx.1, Serial0/3/1:0 via xxx.xxx.xxx.1/32
valid adjacency
via xxx.xxx.xxx.2, 0 dependencies, recursive
traffic share 1
next hop xxx.xxx.xxx.2, Serial0/3/0:0 via xxx.xxx.xxx.2/32
valid adjacency
via xxx.xxx.xxx.3, 0 dependencies, recursive
traffic share 1
next hop xxx.xxx.xxx.3, Serial0/2/0:0 via xxx.xxx.xxx.3/32
valid adjacency
via xxx.xxx.xxx.4, 0 dependencies, recursive
traffic share 1
next hop xxx.xxx.xxx.4, Serial0/1/0:0 via xxx.xxx.xxx.4/32
valid adjacency
0 packets, 0 bytes switched through the prefix
tmstats: external 0 packets, 0 bytes
internal 0 packets, 0 bytes
Load distribution: 0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 (refcount 1)
Hash OK Interface Address Packets
1 Y Serial0/3/1:0 point2point 0
2 Y Serial0/3/0:0 point2point 0
3 Y Serial0/2/0:0 point2point 0
4 Y Serial0/1/0:0 point2point 0
5 Y Serial0/3/1:0 point2point 0
6 Y Serial0/3/0:0 point2point 0
7 Y Serial0/2/0:0 point2point 0
8 Y Serial0/1/0:0 point2point 0
9 Y Serial0/3/1:0 point2point 0
10 Y Serial0/3/0:0 point2point 0
11 Y Serial0/2/0:0 point2point 0
12 Y Serial0/1/0:0 point2point 0
13 Y Serial0/3/1:0 point2point 0
14 Y Serial0/3/0:0 point2point 0
15 Y Serial0/2/0:0 point2point 0
16 Y Serial0/1/0:0 point2point 0
refcount 3285, covered prefixes:
xxx.xxx.xxx.1/30
xxx.xxx.xxx.2/30
255.255.255.255/32
224.0.0.0/4
xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx/29
xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx/30
xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx/30
0.0.0.0/32
#
04-14-2006 08:55 AM
This output shows that per destination (which is really per flow, meaning src and dest IP address are considered) will take place. It is possible that loadsharing will not make use of all interfaces equally if you only have a few flows. The probability of equal loadsharing usually increases when the number of flows is higher.
Hope this helps,
04-14-2006 09:35 AM
That makes sense...I'll generate more traffic for further testing.
Thank you for your help!
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide