07-24-2023
10:11 PM
- last edited on
07-27-2023
10:25 PM
by
Translator
Hi!
I have an overlapping problem.
Router 1 - on g0/0/0 has ip add 192.168.1.1/16 and on g0/0/1
I want to choose the
192.168.0.1/24 ip
add. Here is the overlap. It is possible to keep the /16 subnet mask? What is the solution?
Solved! Go to Solution.
07-25-2023 12:11 AM
If your router supports VRF, it would be the only solution. Put each interface in a different VRF.
https://study-ccnp.com/cisco-vrf-virtual-routing-forwarding/
07-24-2023
10:27 PM
- last edited on
07-27-2023
10:27 PM
by
Translator
Hello @rma123456789,
You say want to choose the
192.168.0.1/24 ip add
This is a mandatory choice?
/16 in a router interface is not common. /30 for interco between routers are better choice.
07-24-2023 10:42 PM
It is mandatory. Maybe If I use NAT it will works (to keep the /16 subnet mask)?
07-24-2023 11:15 PM - edited 07-24-2023 11:16 PM
NAT is apply to flow in ingress or/and egress to interface(s).
Here you want to configure static IP address on an interface / same subnet as an other interface ; overlap issue.
07-25-2023 12:11 AM
If your router supports VRF, it would be the only solution. Put each interface in a different VRF.
https://study-ccnp.com/cisco-vrf-virtual-routing-forwarding/
07-25-2023 10:18 PM
My router doesn't supports VRF, I will subnet the /16 mask. Thank you for the answer, I learned something new today.
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide