05-20-2008 11:32 AM - edited 03-03-2019 10:01 PM
What would be the best way to configure OSPF Routing to pass from R1 thru Checkpoint FW to R2 without establishing a GRE Tunnel. I have attmepted this via ethernet interfaces configured with "ip ospf network non-broadcast" command. Specifying neigbhor commands in the OSPF process. Also we are using secondary ip address. I have attached the configs of the two routers. So far All I get on R2 is attempt/drother. Any suggestions are most welcome.
05-20-2008 12:04 PM
Joel,
As far as I know, you will only be able to get an adjacency between R1 and R2 if you configure the transparent mode on the Checkpoint FW1 platform. I know this is the case when you use a Cisco FW service module (FWSM).
In routed mode, you will simply not be able to achieve that as the OSPF packets are sent with a TTL of 1 and decremented on the Checkpoint device.
Regards,
05-20-2008 01:40 PM
Thank You "hritter" I appreciate the insight with our problem. What is the best way to route through a firewall with a Cisco router on each side.
Thank You
05-20-2008 04:15 PM
Joel,
As mentioned in my previous post, the best way would probably be to use the transparent mode on the Checkpoint FW-1 device, which would allow you to have an adjacency between R1 and R2.
If you don't want to go from routed to transparent mode, then I would recommend to run BGP through the FW and to redistribute between OSPF and BGP on either side.
Regards,
05-20-2008 05:05 PM
Joel,
Are you trying to run OSPF with the Checkpoint firewall? I've done this and it worked well. There was an FWSM on the inside and a 2600 router on the outside.
If not, what's your reason for not letting the Checkpoint participate in OSPF?
Keith
Co-Founder LinuxDynasty
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide