08-15-2011 12:31 PM - edited 03-04-2019 01:17 PM
All,
Is it possible to create your own bottleneck? Here's the problem:
I have an ethernet handoff from our provider. It's a 100Mb link with a 50Mb CIR. I have the bandwidth statement on the interface for 50000 and a service policy that shapes class-default for 50Mb. We have TONS of output drops, but the circuit hasn't been above 35Mb. I'm wondering if going from 100Mb (inside) to a bandwidth of 50Mb (specified on 'outside' interface) is causing the router to see it as congestion. Even if, why would I be seeing tail drops if I never reach above 35Mb?
policy-map COS
class HIGH
priority 6000
set ip dscp ef
class MEDIUM
bandwidth remaining percent 60
set ip dscp af31
service-policy MARK-BGP
class LOW
bandwidth remaining percent 30
set ip dscp af21
class class-default
bandwidth remaining percent 10
set ip dscp default
random-detect
shape average 50000000
service-policy AVPN
!
interface FastEthernet0/0/0
bandwidth 50000
no ip address
duplex full
speed 100
service-policy output COS
QoS Set
dscp default
Packets marked 220722492
Exp-weight-constant: 9 (1/512)
Mean queue depth: 18 packets
class Transmitted Random drop Tail drop Minimum Maximum Mark
pkts/bytes pkts/bytes pkts/bytes thresh thresh prob
0 220089486/172146352525 554475/476267172 90761/75634968 20 40 1/10
Thanks,
John
Solved! Go to Solution.
08-15-2011 01:02 PM
Disclaimer
The Author of this posting offers the information contained within this posting without consideration and with the reader's understanding that there's no implied or expressed suitability or fitness for any purpose. Information provided is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as rendering professional advice of any kind. Usage of this posting's information is solely at reader's own risk.
Liability Disclaimer
In no event shall Author be liable for any damages whatsoever (including, without limitation, damages for loss of use, data or profit) arising out of the use or inability to use the posting's information even if Author has been advised of the possibility of such damage.
Posting
Your posted stats shows "Mean queue depth: 18 packets".
How are you "seeing" never more than 35 Mbps? Reason I ask, shapers, policers, WRED work at a much, much, much finer granularity than something like even 30 interface stats.
There's a good change your WRED (default) thresholds are much too restrictive for 50 Mbps on a MAN/WAN. Suggest you remove WRED altogether.
08-15-2011 01:02 PM
Disclaimer
The Author of this posting offers the information contained within this posting without consideration and with the reader's understanding that there's no implied or expressed suitability or fitness for any purpose. Information provided is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as rendering professional advice of any kind. Usage of this posting's information is solely at reader's own risk.
Liability Disclaimer
In no event shall Author be liable for any damages whatsoever (including, without limitation, damages for loss of use, data or profit) arising out of the use or inability to use the posting's information even if Author has been advised of the possibility of such damage.
Posting
Your posted stats shows "Mean queue depth: 18 packets".
How are you "seeing" never more than 35 Mbps? Reason I ask, shapers, policers, WRED work at a much, much, much finer granularity than something like even 30 interface stats.
There's a good change your WRED (default) thresholds are much too restrictive for 50 Mbps on a MAN/WAN. Suggest you remove WRED altogether.
08-15-2011 01:08 PM
Our bandwidth monitoring server is only showing about 17Mb at the moment. I'm going to remove WRED and see if that helps.
Thanks!
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide