12-02-2015 02:28 AM - edited 03-05-2019 02:51 AM
Hi Team,
Regards,
VB
12-02-2015 05:55 AM
Disclaimer
The Author of this posting offers the information contained within this posting without consideration and with the reader's understanding that there's no implied or expressed suitability or fitness for any purpose. Information provided is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as rendering professional advice of any kind. Usage of this posting's information is solely at reader's own risk.
Liability Disclaimer
In no event shall Author be liable for any damages wha2tsoever (including, without limitation, damages for loss of use, data or profit) arising out of the use or inability to use the posting's information even if Author has been advised of the possibility of such damage.
Posting
(Have you been able to apply this config to an interface?)
I think what should happen is class AF4X should obtain a minimum of 9% of 290000000 (because I believe it uses the parent's class shaper as its reference bandwidth - oh, and 9% because all your APP classes use bandwidth remaining [they also didn't allocate 100%, so the AF4X class should get even more than 9% even if all other classes want more than their minimums]).
12-02-2015 09:20 PM
Yes, this is a working configuration. As i was told to provide the values in Kb, i was bit confused.
12-03-2015 02:32 AM
Disclaimer
The Author of this posting offers the information contained within this posting without consideration and with the reader's understanding that there's no implied or expressed suitability or fitness for any purpose. Information provided is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as rendering professional advice of any kind. Usage of this posting's information is solely at reader's own risk.
Liability Disclaimer
In no event shall Author be liable for any damages wha2tsoever (including, without limitation, damages for loss of use, data or profit) arising out of the use or inability to use the posting's information even if Author has been advised of the possibility of such damage.
Posting
Provide bandwidth it Kb? Hmm, just a different (and original) way of providing bandwidth settings for classes. I.e. how the policy will behave, doesn't change, but makes it more difficult to maintain the policy across multiple interfaces.
12-07-2015 12:02 AM
yes Joseph... i understand it is difficualt, but my client wants that way.. So i am assigned to change from percentage actual values....
Also do you have any document which says that shaper value will be taken as reference for calculating sub policy map values ?
12-07-2015 05:47 AM
It might be in one of the following.
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/routers/7200-series-routers/110850-queue-limit-output-drops-ios.html
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/ios/qos/configuration/guide/15_1/qos_15_1_book/qos_frhqf_support.html
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/ios/12_0s/feature/guide/12spctsg.html
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide