cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
486
Views
0
Helpful
2
Replies

Question related to NAT/TCP

jbluciani
Level 1
Level 1
Hello all,
I have a 'public' network connected to a 'private' one. Two routers, configured as main/backup, interconnect the private and public networks.
To allow a specific private host to go on the public network, I configured a static nat on the interconnection routers:
interface <to_private_network>
  ip nat inside
interface <to_public_network>
  ip nat outside
ip nat inside source static <private_ip> <public_ip>
I have now a weird result.
UDP-based applications (like snmp) are ok but TCP-based applications (like telnet ou https) are not.
The nat works correctly but the connection stopped after the nat.
Have you ever seen such a behaviour before?
Regards,
Jean-Baptiste
2 Replies 2

mrdogantr
Level 1
Level 1

Hi,

     Can you share your config file.

BR.

Muammer

Hi,

and also your topology.

But to get nat working with a redundant setup like yours you must use stateful nat(SNAT).

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/12_2t/12_2t13/feature/guide/ftsnat.html#wp1051530

Regards.

Don't forget to rate helpful posts.
Getting Started

Find answers to your questions by entering keywords or phrases in the Search bar above. New here? Use these resources to familiarize yourself with the community: