10-04-2016 03:12 AM - edited 03-05-2019 07:11 AM
I have a site with two MPLS CE routers cross connected to core switches. External routes learnt by BGP are re-distributed into EIGRP with the same default metric. The CE1 interface to CoreSwitch1 has delay 10 statement added and CE1 interface to CoreSwitch2 has a delay 100 added. The same set up on CE2.
On the core switch the external route is learnt from both CE routers with an identical metric. So I would then expect the core switches to do per destination load balancing but all my traffic is exiting via CE2
EIGRP-IPv4 Topology Entry for AS(1)/ID(10.232.9.192) for 10.232.7.0/24
State is Passive, Query origin flag is 1, 2 Successor(s), FD is 34304
Descriptor Blocks:
10.232.9.245 (Vlan5), from 10.232.9.245, Send flag is 0x0
Composite metric is (34304/34048), route is External
Vector metric:
Minimum bandwidth is 300000 Kbit
Total delay is 1010 microseconds
Reliability is 255/255
Load is 1/255
Minimum MTU is 1500
Hop count is 1
Originating router is 63.130.156.111
External data:
AS number of route is 65139
External protocol is BGP, external metric is 0
Administrator tag is 4445 (0x0000115D)
10.232.9.246 (Vlan5), from 10.232.9.246, Send flag is 0x0
Composite metric is (34304/34048), route is External
Vector metric:
Minimum bandwidth is 300000 Kbit
Total delay is 1010 microseconds
Reliability is 255/255
Load is 1/255
Minimum MTU is 1500
Hop count is 1
Originating router is 63.130.156.112
External data:
AS number of route is 65139
External protocol is BGP, external metric is 0
Administrator tag is 4445 (0x0000115D)
Is this normal behaviour
10-04-2016 04:08 AM
can you share sh ip route from both core swithes
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide