09-13-2011 08:02 AM - edited 03-04-2019 01:35 PM
Hello All,
We currently having 2821 routers in our HQ and DR Site.
We also have 2811 routers in our remote offices (4)
In our HQ and DR sites we are experiencing packet drops, routers are not able to keep up with data traffic.
Cisco TAC has suggested us to upgrade both routers.
Since we are planning to move to Voice over IP in the next year,
Which router should I choose?
I have been checking the 2921 (that is the replacement for the 2821), but I am not sure if that is the correct option.
I am not a VoIP savvy, so if you need more info, please let me know.
Thanks in advance
09-16-2011 07:08 PM
Disclaimer
The Author of this posting offers the information contained within this posting without consideration and with the reader's understanding that there's no implied or expressed suitability or fitness for any purpose. Information provided is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as rendering professional advice of any kind. Usage of this posting's information is solely at reader's own risk.
Liability Disclaimer
In no event shall Author be liable for any damages whatsoever (including, without limitation, damages for loss of use, data or profit) arising out of the use or inability to use the posting's information even if Author has been advised of the possibility of such damage.
Posting
If you're dropping packets due to insufficient CPU, a "faster" router would be needed, this assuming that your exiting configuration is already optimal.
If you're dropping packets due to insufficient bandwidth, you might need large capacity links, and larger capacity links often increase the load on the router, so you might also need, again, a "faster" router.
In the last paragraph I used "might" because even a link running at capacity and/or dropping packets doesn't always "need" more bandwidth, even to support VoIP across it. Any time you have a network link that can be oversubscribed, drops might occur.
Insufficient details to truly say what you might really need.
PS:
The 2921 rated performance is nearly the same as a 3845. Although that's quite a jump from a 2821, w/o details cannot say whether this is "not enough", "just right", or "too much" for your needs.
09-16-2011 07:15 PM
In our HQ and DR sites we are experiencing packet drops, routers are not able to keep up with data traffic.
What is your WAN speed?
09-17-2011 12:33 AM
Without complex acl's and other services (nat, firewalling), it is hard to see how a 2821 would be unable to keep up with data traffic. The 2921 would be the most logical choice for a replacement but when considering the migration to VOIP you may also need to terminate a PSTN link like an E1/T1. This is where the extra slots in the 3925/3945 may be rerquired.
The best advice I can give you is to make the design for the VOIP solution before deciding on replacement routers.
regards,
Leo
09-17-2011 04:29 AM
Disclaimer
The Author of this posting offers the information contained within this posting without consideration and with the reader's understanding that there's no implied or expressed suitability or fitness for any purpose. Information provided is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as rendering professional advice of any kind. Usage of this posting's information is solely at reader's own risk.
Liability Disclaimer
In no event shall Author be liable for any damages whatsoever (including, without limitation, damages for loss of use, data or profit) arising out of the use or inability to use the posting's information even if Author has been advised of the possibility of such damage.
Posting
Without complex acl's and other services (nat, firewalling), it is hard to see how a 2821 would be unable to keep up with data traffic. The 2921 would be the most logical choice for a replacement but when
Re: "hard to see", that true w/o knowing what type of WAN "speeds" the 2821 is dealing with. If it was connected to an T3/E3 or a FastEthernet handoff, the 2821 could easily "be unable to keep up with data traffic." with sustained full bandwidth of such links.
09-17-2011 10:19 PM
The 2900 has pvdm v3 that contain higher dsp support for voice but again. With voice you need to consider your requirements is this gonna be used as CUBE, voice gateway to pstn with PRI for example and how many links
Are you planing to use additional tdm ports like the FXS for analog and fax end points, once you know the requirements then you can decide which one is the best for you as with routing or as WAN router the hardware requirement is not alleyways the same
Not to mention with the ISR G2 including the 2900 you need to consider buy a license for any feature you need for example with voice you wil need a UC license
Hope this help
09-21-2011 10:57 AM
HQ to all remote offices (4) --> 70 MB
HQ to DR (bridge network) --> 60 MB
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide