08-22-2011 06:17 AM - edited 03-04-2019 01:21 PM
Apart from the ability to participate in BGP, is there any reason you should use a router on an internet edge rather than the SG-300 switch?
08-22-2011 06:31 AM
There are things that routers can do that switches can't and there are things that routers do better eg.
1) QOS - routers have a greater feature set because QOS is limited by the hardware on switches
2) NAT - unless you have a 6500 switch then no other switch supports NAT
3) line termination - swiches generally only provide ethernet connectivity (although some higher end switches provide WAN cards). Routers can terminate ethernet/serial etc..
Jon
08-22-2011 06:39 AM
Just to add to Jon's points
in addition to QoS, NAting limitations
using a switch for Internet is not a good idea at all ( you may use it for a WAN edge but Internet do not )
reasons;
- limited security options ( with the router you can have up to application layer inspection and firewalling using Zonebased firewall ) you can also have intrusion prevention if you need/want using IPS module
- you can use VPN tunnels to be terminated on the edge router
- you might use multiple Internet links later where you need to loadbalance and load share the traffic using PBR and routing
in brief just go with a router yo might look into cisco ISR G2 if you have small to medium network
if its large you can also conside Cisco ASR1000 routers
HTH
pls rate the helpful posts
08-22-2011 07:48 AM
I should mention that there is an ASA behind this switch, the switch is just for connectivity to the ISP, no need for QoS, or VPNs (as these terminate on ASA).. no need for PBR or routing..
Anything else?
08-22-2011 10:05 AM
What's the reason for terminating this connection to the switch instead of the FW?
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide