Hi everyone,
I have configured a laboratory topology in EVE-NG
And i have tested that everything is working correctly.
The topology is:
“Connect to Public and Private WANs, with Separation of Network Traffic”
Explained in this links
https://sdwan-docs.cisco.com/Product_Documentation/Software_Features/SD-WAN_Release_16.3/02System_and_Interfaces/07Network_Interface_Configuration_Examples
In summary, two transport without connection between them.
Only connection to the Control servers (vBond, vManaga and vSmart) from Internet connection transport.
And ALL the USER TRAFFIC is working correctly. The both tunnels are UP and crossing service traffic.
BUT, i have tested that when i make a ping from GUI, vmanage --> monitor -> Select Device -> Troubleshoot --> PING
And i fill the Options with:
--DESTINATION IP -> other vEdge end IP in transport 1 (internet)
- VPN -> VPN 0
- Source Interface -> same transport interface like the other end, transport 1 (internet).
And the ping result is loss a lot of ping or sometimes loss every pings.
If i try the same ping, BUT change the Source interface,
-- DESTINATION IP -> other vEdge end IP in transport 1 (internet)
-- VPN -> VPN 0
-- Source Interface -> OTHER transport interface, now transport 2 (mpls)
The ping Works!!!!!! It is not good.
If i connect to the vEdge Cloud router directly by console, and i do the same PING, i dont loss any icmp packet. Everythins seems Works correclty by console.
MORE DATA:
VMANAGE/VBOND/VSMART and VEDGE CLOUDs with à viptela--19.2.3
In my configuration i have used two color, biz-internet and MPLS.
MPLS has been configured with color restrict and max-control-connection 0.
The tunnels get up. MPLS only with MPLS and BIZ internet only with BIZ-INTERNET
The VPN SERVICE Works correctly by two transport, without loss of traffic.
The difference with the topology of the example is that i have configured TWO default-route in VPN 0, one to INTERNET and other to MPLS.
Could you help me??
it is seem like the vManage GUI when send the traffic via VPN 0 doesnt know attach the source interface correctly, i think.
Thanks
Rubén
