06-06-2015 01:38 PM - edited 03-05-2019 06:56 AM
Hi,
First time post here. I would like some guidance if possible on troubleshooting redundant fiber links between 3 switches at the access layer and then a central switch at the distribution layer, which then goes to a router. All switches are just working at layer two. With the router doing doing all the layer 3 stuff. I have included a picture of the layout. This is only showing the fiber trunks between the switches.
My question is this. If one of the links go down say sw1 2/0/49. To test this port I take the working fiber connection from from sw1 1/0/50 ( which goes to sw3) and put it into Unit 2 2/0/49 to see if it might be a cable or port issue on sw2. All Vlan's are the same through out.
All fiber ports are configured the same on sw1, with only the description and channel-group being different:
T2409swt0001#sh run int gi 1/0/49
Building configuration...
Current configuration : 244 bytes
!
interface GigabitEthernet1/0/49
description IDF 2 - T2409swt0002
switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
switchport trunk allowed vlan 1-79,81-4094
switchport mode trunk
snmp trap mac-notification change added
channel-group 2 mode on
end
I was told we are not allowed to move the fiber from any trunk port that is assigned to a different switch for troubleshooting. Is there a good reason for this? I think I just figured it out. It seems obvious after drawing this out that the main difference here is the channel-groups or I believed they are also called ether-channel. I haven't got to this in my studies yet, obviously I need to. It seems to me that that will cause a problem by trying to split the same channel-group to two switches right?
Thanks!
Mike
06-09-2015 11:35 AM
Since all of your switch uplinks are in an etherchannel, you do not want to move ports arround for testing. You will cause major issues, ether channels do load balancing between all of the cables in a channel. If you do move the ports your core switch could send frames to the wrong switch and they would be dropped, and cause a lot of retransmission attempts, and putting undo load over your network. If they were not in a channel group there would be spanning tree loops in this setup.
here is a link to help you understand etherchannels.
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/lan-switching/etherchannel/12023-4.html
06-10-2015 05:43 AM
Thanks Brett,
Much appreciated, also thanks for the link!
Mike
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide