06-26-2012 10:39 PM - edited 03-04-2019 04:48 PM
Hi all,
I have 1841 router with 2 serial Wan interfaces each one is 2 Mbps
i want to configure them to use all of 4 Mbps
How to Configure them
Thanks
06-26-2012 11:36 PM
Hi,
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/qos/configuration/guide/mlppp_over_serial.html
Regards.
Alain.
Don't forget to rate helpful posts.
06-26-2012 11:40 PM
this my serials interfaces configurations
Serial Config :
interface Serial0/0/0
no ip address
encapsulation frame-relay IETF
no shutdown
frame-relay lmi-type q933a
!
interface Serial0/0/0.16 point-to-point
ip address x.x.x.x 255.255.255.252
frame-relay interface-dlci 16
06-27-2012 01:56 AM
Hi,
I only see one physical serial interface here, where's the other ?
For frame-relay, you'll have to use PPPoFR and then MPPP.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/12_0t/12_0t1/feature/guide/pppframe.html
Regards.
Alain.
Don't forget to rate helpful posts.
06-27-2012 05:21 AM
Hello Ed,
There is a few steps you have to take to create a multilink over frame relay.
first you have to create a QoS policy map for the queueing purposes (required) ! multilink use FIFO by default.
then you have to associate a virtual template to your frame relay VC dlci .
assign your virtual template (which is bound to the frame relay VC) to a multilink interface and configure the ML int.
I put a sample config with regards to the information you provided here (I do the least required config):
service-policy FRAME
class class-default
fair-queue
int virtual-temp 1
no ip add
ppp multilink
ppp multi group 1
int s0/0/0.16
frame-r interface-dlci 16 ppp virtual-temp 1
int multilink 1
ip add x.x.x.x 255.255.255.252
ppp multilink
ppp multilink group 1
bandwidth X ...................(optional)
service-policy out FRAME
end
!
show ppp multilink ...... (to verify)
plz Rate if it helped,
Soroush.
06-27-2012 05:26 AM
In addition to what everyone else has already stated, you also need to be configured on the other side to support MLP. You can't just bond it on your side and get it to transmit traffic at a higher rate if the other side doesn't support it. If these are P2P links that you control, you'll need to configure the other side for MLP as well. If it's a provider based service, you'll need to contact them and have them support your MLP connection.
HTH,
John
06-27-2012 06:06 AM
Hello Ed,
keeping in mind what John has noted another possible option is to use multilink FR FRF.16 to avoid PPP+FR overhead
see
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/12_2s/feature/guide/fs_mfr.html
Again it has to be supported and configured on both sides
Hope to help
Giuseppe
06-27-2012 06:15 AM
i can only configure one side because the other side is the ISP
what about load sharing per packet is it good ???
06-27-2012 10:19 AM
Hello Ed,
load balancing per packet is not recommended as it can cause out of order issues by sending packets of the same flow (same IP source address same IP destination address) over different paths with slightly different delays.
You can use both links in Equal cost multi path using flow based load balancing and you should achieve load sharing on the links. This is the default and allows to avoid out of order issues.
To use any form of link aggregation you would need cooperation of the ISP as stated before
Hope to help
Giuseppe
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide