using a vrf ospf process without super backbone on c3750?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-15-2011 02:31 AM - edited 03-04-2019 11:45 AM
Hi
We have 2 completely different networks which we want, at a certain location, to bring physically on 2 (redundant) c3750's.
1 of the 2 networks was already on those switches, and participates in ospf (as a stub area).
So when the second network came, we created a vrf, and a vrf ospf process (which initially participated in area 0 of the other network). Everything worked fine. We didn't change anything of the config of network 1 (so didn't define any vrf's for the ospf process or interfaces).
Now we decided that the location of network 2 (the new one, in a vrf) should no longer be in area 0, but should be a totally stub area, with no config of area 0 on that site). This is were the problems began. The configuration didn't put a default gateway in the VRF's routing table ( that is injected by the ABR on another location). on further inspection we saw why.
It seems that an ospf process in a vrf is asuming there is a MPLS VPN superbackbone
(from sh ip ospf)
Connected to MPLS VPN Superbackbone, VRF internet
It is an area border router
so this ospf process made itself ABR, ignoring information from area 0 coming via a non-backbone area).
my question is rather simple... Can i prevent this ospf process (running in a VRF) from becoming ABR?
kind regards
Arne
- Labels:
-
Routing Protocols
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-15-2011 07:14 AM
Hi Arne,
Yes, it should be possible - try using the command capability vrf-lite in the OSPF process run in the VRF. That should prevent it from considering itself to be an ABR.
If this does not work then please be so kind as to provide a quick picture of your network, including the current configuration of your OSPF processes on the device having the VRF table.
Best regards,
Peter
