11-13-2013 02:27 AM - edited 03-04-2019 09:34 PM
Hello,
Here's the situation :
I have 3 areas : 0, 1 and 2, the ABR are Cisco and cloud areas equipments are the quagga Version 0.99.17 :
------quagga_area0------ Cisco01 ------quagga_area1------ Cisco12 ------quagga_area2------
I created my virtual- link between the two Cisco to link area 2 to area 0 , adding " area 1 virtual- link ROUTER- ID " on both routers.
The VL is up.
Cisco12 side: I have all the routes whose " O IA" of area 0 but they aren't propagated to area 2 . So, area 2 can't join the area 0.
Cisco01 side: I have just the routes "O" of areas 0 and 1 , and no routes from area 2. In this router, the Summary ( Area 0 ) doesn't contain the routes of area 2 unlike the Summary ( Area 1 ) which contains the routes of area 2 from ADV router : Cisco12
Furthermore, the quagga equipements of area 1 have the routes of the three areas and can reach directly the area 2 equipments by Cisco12 without having to go through the area 0 !!!
I do not understand why Cisco01 can't have the routes of area 2 ( linked with aire0 by VL ) ! and why the quagga area 1 doesn't pass through the area 0 then VL to reach area2 !
Any ideas?
Thank you for your help,
B.
11-13-2013 05:18 AM
Hi,
I know this is not what you are asking for, but can you do tunnel instead of VL? Both should be able to solve the problem, but VL has limitation on the area type, and the transit router will receive all the LSA. I like tunnel better, is easier to understand, and tshoot. Just build a tunnel between Cisco01 and Cisco12, put the tunnel in area 0.
HTH,
Lei Tian
11-13-2013 08:22 AM
Hello,
Thx LeiTian, but i found the problem:
Instead of all documents on the Internet, it's necessary to declare the area 0 in Cisco 12,
So i added the line: area 0 authentication message-digest
It's strange but that's all.
Bassel
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide