WAN Load balance using static routes

[saadsalahegypt]

Dears, 

I have Cisco routers with 4 lte SIMs,  I want to do load balance so I do the following 

ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 cellul 0/0/0

ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 cellul 0/1/0

ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 cellul 0/2/0

ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 cellul 0/3/0

 inter range  cell 0/0/0 , cell 0/1/0 , cell 0/2/0 , cell 0/3/0 

ip load-sharing per-packet

but when I come to ping i got the following result !....!....!....!    means only the following one reply while all are working fine when they are alone means only cell 0/1/0 is working it replys 

so what is wrong?! 

I tried it on GNS I git the same output till I change the default route to be with next hop ip address not the exit interface 

BUT in the real environment the ip of cellular interface is ip address negotiated means I cant use the same approach on GNS 

THANKS

[Richard Burts]

There are options to deal with negotiated interface addresses such as

ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 dhcp

I would also suggest that specifying load balance per packet is likely to be problematic.

HTH

Rick

[saadsalahegypt]

Dear, 

I tried it doesnt work