04-08-2019 12:32 AM
Hi expert
1) I would like to know why a lot of enterprise use MPLS active-standby mode? Why not active-active? Is it highly inefficient as enterprises are paying for far more bandwidth than they are actually leveraging.
2) What is the difference between MPLS and SD Wan load balancing? Which one is better?
05-16-2019 07:49 AM
I hope I know the answer but here is what I think.
Usually, dual MPLS has a vrrp configured on two routers.
One router will become a master, and it will route all the traffics out of network.
In order to be a symmetrical routing, return packets will take the same path.
Second router is standby by design.
On SDWAN - Viptela, routing is not done on per interface basis, but on per site basis.
Meaning, to get to 10.20.30.0/24, next hop is a site, not ip address of next hop.
This means, multiple paths can all be used, based on policy.
If you have two routers in sdwan/viptela, primary router will be used for traffic out of network.
Return packets are usually routed through the second device.
In my case, I have two vEdge out of DC.
One with better MED setting will be used for all outgoing traffics.
Return packets are via the second vEdge device.
05-24-2019 01:33 PM
Hi Anwar,
1. In dual-edge branch scenario we are using active/standby setup for features which requires symmetric traffic flow. For example most DPI engines require full flow information in order to properly identify applications based on signatures. This means that traffic needs to exit and enter through same physical box (unless you use advanced detection mechanisms like Cisco SD-AVC).
2. The SD-WAN load balancing methods are much more flexible and granular. Except standard per-flow load balancing we can achieve things like:
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide