cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
2389
Views
5
Helpful
6
Replies

configure sun cluster on nexus 9k

sufyan.a1
Frequent Visitor
Frequent Visitor

I have two sun servers connected to two nexus, where each server is connected to both nexus, when I shutdown the port the connected to MPLS, the sun cluster is going to down.

is there any special configuration for sun cluster on nexus.

 

regards,

 

6 Replies 6

sufyan.a1
Frequent Visitor
Frequent Visitor

is there anyone have idea?

 

 

Kirk J
Cisco Employee
Cisco Employee

Greetings.

How about a topology, and some configurations of your ports facing the Sun servers, as well as the ports going to the MPLS.

 

Thanks,

Kirk..

sufyan.a1
Frequent Visitor
Frequent Visitor

thank you for replay, please find attached for drawing, I check with Sun admin, and I found each server is connected with two cable to the same core, is this will effect.

 

thank you again

sufyan

 

 

It would helpful if you defined the following:

  • What is a cluster failure?  (the cluster itself goes down, services shut down, or you can't reach the VIP ? )
  • are there cluster services that rely on connectivity out your MPLS link?
  • When you are 'measuring' a cluster failure, how are you communicating with the cluster from your remote workstation?  A link off the N9Ks going to an access switch, etc?
  • It appears you have a VPC defined.  For the Port-channel links, what kind of channel-group config do you have?  How is the 'bond' configured on the SUN servers?

Thanks,

Kirk...

sufyan.a1
Frequent Visitor
Frequent Visitor

Hello Kirk,

 

- please find bleow the error on cluster server:

NIC failure detected on vnet0

of group ipmp

Apr  7 09:13:49 AMMBEEBP01 in.mpathd[335]: [ID 832587 daemon.error] Successfully failed over from

NIC vnet0 to NIC vnet1

Apr  7 09:13:56 AMMBEEBP01 in.mpathd[335]: [ID 585766 daemon.error] Cannot meet requested failure

detection time of 10000 ms on (inet vnet1) new failure detection time for group "ipmp" is 32242 ms

Apr  7 09:14:56 AMMBEEBP01 in.mpathd[335]: [ID 302819 daemon.error] Improved failure detection tim

e 16121 ms on (inet vnet1) for group "ipmp"

Apr  7 09:14:59 AMMBEEBP01 in.mpathd[335]: [ID 302819 daemon.error] Improved failure detection tim

e 10000 ms on (inet vnet1) for group "ipmp"

Apr  7 09:15:12 AMMBEEBP01 in.mpathd[335]: [ID 168056 daemon.error] All Interfaces in group ipmp h

ave failed

Apr  7 09:15:12 AMMBEEBP01 Cluster.PNM: [ID 890413 daemon.notice] ipmp: state transition from OK t

o DOWN.

 

vnet0: flags=1000843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST,IPv4> mtu 1500 index 2

        inet 10.20.32.52 netmask ffffff00 broadcast 10.20.32.255

        groupname ipmp

        ether 0:14:4f:f9:74:a5

vnet1: flags=9040843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST,DEPRECATED,IPv4,NOFAILOVER> mtu 1500 index 3

        inet 10.20.32.56 netmask ffffff00 broadcast 10.20.32.255

        groupname ipmp

        ether 0:14:4f:f8:78:70

 -are there cluster services that rely on connectivity out your MPLS link?

no it's connected to LAN Nexus.

- When you are 'measuring' a cluster failure, how are you communicating with the cluster from your remote workstation?  A link off the N9Ks going to an access switch, etc?

the connection is going down, so the users can't connect to cluster, but you can access the  N9Ks

 - It appears you have a VPC defined.  For the Port-channel links, what kind of channel-group config do you have?  How is the 'bond' configured on the SUN servers?

I have VPC between N9Ks, but no Port-channel  configured for sun cluster, I connected the Suns Servers direct.

 

thanks

 

Rick1776
Level 11
Level 11
I agree with Kirk, can answer the question until we get the entire configuration setup.

A lot is going to have to do with how the Sun severs have their NIC teaming configured and on how the port-channel/channel-group is configured.

Review Cisco Networking for a $25 gift card