cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
865
Views
0
Helpful
3
Replies

Nexus 1000v and Nexus 2248 FEX

stephen.ehlas
Level 1
Level 1

Hi

I have two Nexus 2248 FEX TOR design, and I need to connect my four ESX 5.1 servers. My initial design used the Nexus 1000v, 2 etherchannels upto the nexus 2248's and a vpc link for redundency

   N2k          N2k

     |               |

     |    vPC     |        

     |               |

------------------------

          N1K

------------------------

I'm not sure if this is possible due to the BPDU's received on the 2248 stop me attaching another switch (nexus 1000v) underneath it. Is this correct?

Also, if I can not use vPC to uplink to the N2K doe sthis mean I need 2 etherchannels, with STP to block one link?

How have other people over come this issue? I'm sure I'm not the only one

Regards

Steve

1 Accepted Solution

Accepted Solutions

mwronkow
Cisco Employee
Cisco Employee

Hello Steve,

This is the recommended topology for N1k hosts.  N1k drops all BPDUs on ingress interface and do not transmit any - we don't run STP.  Use LACP for PCs.

Matthew

View solution in original post

3 Replies 3

mwronkow
Cisco Employee
Cisco Employee

Hello Steve,

This is the recommended topology for N1k hosts.  N1k drops all BPDUs on ingress interface and do not transmit any - we don't run STP.  Use LACP for PCs.

Matthew

stephen.ehlas
Level 1
Level 1

Hi Matthew

Thanks for the quick reply. Am I right in assuming that this means I will have to implement MAC pinning on the etherchannels?

Steve

Hello Steve,

No. I would run VPC across the N2ks with LACP port-channels.

Follow page 2 "N1k on UCS-C or Rack Mount servers connected to Nexus 5k/7k switches with vPC" in this doc:

https://supportforums.cisco.com/docs/DOC-18222

Matthew

Review Cisco Networking for a $25 gift card