02-20-2017 02:11 PM
I've run across an issue with a new 5672UP switch and GLC-T modules that I was hoping someone had an answer for. When I insert the GLC-T modules into the 5672UP and plug in another device (via CAT 6 Ethernet), the other device (an ASA in this example) gives me a link light and show 'UP/UP' but the interface on the 5672UP shows "Link not connected". I've tried another port within the first 32 ports with the same result. When I insert the GLC-T module into one of the UP's (ports 33-48), it works just fine. I can't think of any other reason for this behavior other than a bug. I'm running the latest version, 7.3(1)N1(1). I'd open a Cisco TAC case but I'm waiting on the devices to get covered under a contract which will likely take a week or so. In the meantime I figured I'd try this forum.
Solved! Go to Solution.
02-21-2017 06:24 AM
I just found this, looks pretty specific to your issue.
https://bst.cloudapps.cisco.com/bugsearch/bug/CSCvb42221/?reffering_site=dumpcr
Please try one of the fixed releases and see if there is any positive results.
-Wes
02-20-2017 02:27 PM
Looks like you need GLC-TE for 5600. GLC-T is not supported:
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/interfaces_modules/transceiver_modules/compatibility/matrix/GE_Tx_Matrix.html#_Toc462044450
Wes
02-20-2017 02:34 PM
02-20-2017 02:50 PM
Double checking, GLC-T should work for 5600.
Try to hard code the speed on the interface to 1000 MB
speed 1000
If this does not work:
See if this command on the interface has any impact on the link status:
'service unsupported-transceiver'
Wes
02-20-2017 02:53 PM
Yea I already tried both. You have to manually set the speed to otherwise you'll get 'SFP validation failed'.
02-20-2017 03:08 PM
Try to disable auto-nego:
no negotiate auto
Also, are we sure this is a supported Cisco GLC-T?
-Wes
02-20-2017 03:11 PM
Yea I tried disabling negotiate auto and the link status went to 'SFP validation failed'. They say GLC-T on the outside and below is the output of the 'show interface e1/1 transceiver' command...
Ethernet1/1
transceiver is present
type is SFP-1000BASE-T
name is CISCO-METHODE
part number is GLC-T
revision is E
serial number is XXXXXXX
nominal bitrate is 1300 MBit/sec
Link length supported for copper is 100 m
cisco id is --
cisco extended id number is 4
02-20-2017 03:20 PM
If you have multiple GLC-T exhibiting the same behavior, I suspect it is something to do with that specific transceiver batch.
I would open a TAC case and have them send you a replacement to rule out hardware.
-Wes
02-21-2017 06:00 AM
Yes all of the GLC-T's exhibit the same behavior but because they all work in ports 33-48 but not 1-32 I don't see it being a GLC-T issue but rather an issue with the switches themselves.
02-21-2017 06:02 AM
Researching some internal knowledge bases, we have customers using those GLC-T with those switches and no issues.
I believe this could be a GLC-T specific issue, but until you have a replacement or a TAC case to investigate the switch, it will be hard to tell.
-Wes
02-21-2017 06:10 AM
What code version are they running?
02-21-2017 06:16 AM
Earlier releases than 7.3....some are on 7.0.
7.0(1)N1(1)
Are we sure the ASA interface does 1GB ? It's not a 10/100 port is it?
What if you put 2x GLC-T in the Nexus and loop back to each other?
-Wes
02-21-2017 06:18 AM
Ok. I'll try that code version.
Yes I tried plugging in a 2960 and also my laptop to rule out something with the ASA.
I also tried looping them as well. Same result.
02-21-2017 06:24 AM
I just found this, looks pretty specific to your issue.
https://bst.cloudapps.cisco.com/bugsearch/bug/CSCvb42221/?reffering_site=dumpcr
Please try one of the fixed releases and see if there is any positive results.
-Wes
02-21-2017 06:32 AM
Good find. I suspect this is the issue although none of the "Known Fixed Releases:" (7.1.5 or 7.3.2) are available for download...the latest available for download are 7.1.4 and 7.3.1.
Find answers to your questions by entering keywords or phrases in the Search bar above. New here? Use these resources to familiarize yourself with the community: