04-10-2013 06:01 AM
As i understanding, FCoE : encapsulated FC in Ethernet packet
so that FCoE packet is same as Ethernet packet
If this is rigth, is it mean that i can transfer FCoE packet through normal switch instead of Nexus?
Solved! Go to Solution.
04-12-2013 11:55 AM
Its true that from Ethernet perspective, FCoE is just another Upper layer Protocol. ( Ethertype 0x8906 denoting FCoE, Ethertype 0x8914 denoting FCoE Initializing Protocol). Important thing to note is FCoE requires the underlying Ethernet network to be lossless (+ ability to support jumbo frames) . Enhancements to Ethernet had to be made to support this requirement (
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/solutions/collateral/ns340/ns517/ns224/ns783/at_a_glance_c45-460907.pdf
). Hence, your topology would not work as of today.
04-12-2013 08:00 PM
That's correct. If you want looseless network for your SANs, Nexus is the way to go.
Nexus 7K for your core and distro, 6K (40 Gbps) or 5K (10 Gbps) as your access and 2K for your top-of-rack.
04-10-2013 12:56 PM
Hello Wai,
The answer is no. C6509/2960/3750 were not design to run FCOE. Only N7K/N5K/MDS products do.
04-12-2013 09:12 AM
How about this
[Server] ---- [Nexus N5K] -------- [6509] --------- [2960] -----------[6509] --------- [Nexus N5K] ------------- [Storage]
07-23-2016 01:23 AM
Hi,
If is to Do the Below what is the Switch to select.
Server -----FC-----(Cisco Switch)-----FC----Storage
|------------------------------|
|
LAN
07-23-2016 01:31 AM
Hi Daniel
If your switch needs classical FC and Ethernet, Nexus 5k is the solution.
04-10-2013 04:28 PM
FCoE/FC is the exclusive domain of the Nexus-series and MDS-series of switches.
04-12-2013 09:13 AM
If FCOE is really encapsulated in ethernet packet
why 6509/3750/2960 cannot run such packet?
as i know FCOE is a Jumbo frame
04-12-2013 11:55 AM
Its true that from Ethernet perspective, FCoE is just another Upper layer Protocol. ( Ethertype 0x8906 denoting FCoE, Ethertype 0x8914 denoting FCoE Initializing Protocol). Important thing to note is FCoE requires the underlying Ethernet network to be lossless (+ ability to support jumbo frames) . Enhancements to Ethernet had to be made to support this requirement (
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/solutions/collateral/ns340/ns517/ns224/ns783/at_a_glance_c45-460907.pdf
). Hence, your topology would not work as of today.
04-12-2013 07:56 PM
Oh, please correct me if i am wrong
my topology will not work because we cannot built a lossless network with 6500/3750/2960 series switch, as a result, running FCoE on such devices will cause the FCoE not work because of packet loss, so we need Nexus environment
If I use all Nesux on my network, it will be fine, right?
04-12-2013 08:00 PM
That's correct. If you want looseless network for your SANs, Nexus is the way to go.
Nexus 7K for your core and distro, 6K (40 Gbps) or 5K (10 Gbps) as your access and 2K for your top-of-rack.
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide