03-22-2012 04:26 AM
Hello!
I have number of SF300 switches in production and have found bug with command "interface range".
When I reconfigure interfaces previously configured with "interface range" to different VLAN interface change VLAN, but after reboot it move back to vlan configured with "interface range".
SW2#sh ver
SW version 1.1.2.0 ( date 12-Nov-2011 time 23:34:26 )
Boot version 1.0.0.4 ( date 08-Apr-2010 time 16:37:57 )
HW version V01
...
SW2#sh int switchport gi4
Port : gi4
Port Mode: Access
Gvrp Status: disabled
Ingress Filtering: true
Acceptable Frame Type: admitAll
Ingress UnTagged VLAN ( NATIVE ): 11
Port is member in:
Vlan Name Egress rule Port Membership Type
---- -------------------------------- ----------- --------------------
11 User Untagged Static
...
SW2#sh run
interface fa10
description WiFI(1)
exit
vlan database
vlan 2,4,11
exit
interface gi3
switchport default-vlan tagged
exit
interface range fa14-20,fa22-24
switchport access vlan 2
exit
interface range fa10,fa13
switchport access vlan 4
exit
interface range fa1-2,fa21,gi4
switchport access vlan 11
exit...
SW2#conf t
SW2(config)#int gi4
SW2(config-if)#switchport access vlan 11
...
SW2#sh int switchport gi4
Port : gi4
Port Mode: Access
Gvrp Status: disabled
Ingress Filtering: true
Acceptable Frame Type: admitAll
Ingress UnTagged VLAN ( NATIVE ): 4
Port is member in:
Vlan Name Egress rule Port Membership Type
---- -------------------------------- ----------- --------------------
4 WiFI Untagged Static
...SW2#sh startup-config
interface fa10
description WiFI(1)
exit
vlan database
vlan 2,4,11
exit
interface gi3
switchport default-vlan tagged
exit
interface range fa14-20,fa22-24
switchport access vlan 2
exit
interface range fa10,fa13
switchport access vlan 4
exit
interface range fa1-2,fa21,gi4
switchport access vlan 11
>!!!!!!!!!!?????????????????????????
SW2#write mem
...
SW2#reload
...
==============
!!!!!DOWNTIME!!!!
==============
SW2#sh int switchport gi4
Port : gi4
Port Mode: Access
Gvrp Status: disabled
Ingress Filtering: true
Acceptable Frame Type: admitAll
Ingress UnTagged VLAN ( NATIVE ): 11
Port is member in:
Vlan Name Egress rule Port Membership Type
---- -------------------------------- ----------- --------------------
11 User Untagged Static
Now the only way to fix it:
copy run tftp://XXXXXXX
copy tftp://XXXXXX start
reload
Please let me know if this bus will be fixed in next software releas!
Regards
Sergiy A. Pyvovaroff (CCNP).
03-24-2012 09:30 PM
Hi Sergry,
Thank you for the explanation, but to fix software, someone has to open a Service Request . It may have been noticed and scheduled for fix.
I would you ask you to please be kind enough to goto www.cisco.com/go/sbsc and call by phone or click to chat with the folks at the small business support center (SBSC) and open a case. They will give in response a service request (SR) number.
It doesn't take long to open a SR, and someone at SBSC is then responsible for feedback to you to let you know what's happening.
The SR will ensure that;
Since you have a CCNP, I am guessing that this process is not foreign to you.
It can be annoying opening a case, especially when you have documented the issue in the post, but at least you can point the technician to this posting, where you have almost explained everything needed to get development to look at the problem.
Sergry, it's a interest observation, I just use the 300 series GUI to add Gig2 as a access port to vlan 2, the following script was created;
interface gigabitethernet2
switchport mode access
switchport access vlan 2
switchport general pvid 2 - this is a error I guess as the switch port is in access mode.
exit
Did you use the GUI to generate the CLI. or just use the CLI without reference to the CLI manual?.
This CLI is not identical to a Catalyst CLI. see the following URL for the 300 series CLI manual;
Again, please be so kind to spend a little time to open a SR.
I will be tomorrow, on a issue I highlighted in red. It is a minor issue for me, as the switch still leaves GiG2, in access mode, as a untagged interface in VLAN2.
regards Dave
03-29-2012 05:14 AM
Now I have no free SF300 switch to recreate problem. All my SF300 run in production environment. I'll create ticket when I get unused SF300 for new branch office. No service contract like "Smart net" needed for ticket creation?
I always use CLI to configure switches and routers. Even now, when I have break right arm, typing command faster for me then web GUI.
The nature of error is the following:
When I configure real catalyst whith the command “INTERFACE RANGE” all parameters changing for interfaces but command “INTERFACE RANGE” never left in run or start text config of the switch.
When I configure SF-300 with legal by documentation command “INTERFACE RANGE”
SW#conf t
SW(config)#interface range fa1-24,gi1-2
SW(config)#switchport mode access
SW(config)#switchport access vlan 11
this strings left at the top of the run conig
sh run
interface range fa1-24,gi1-2
switchport mode access
switchport access vlan 11
...
even when I change parametr of individual intefaces from range
SW#conf t
SW(config)#interface gi1
SW(config)#switchport mode access
SW(config)#switchport access vlan 4
the command
interface range fa1-24,gi1-2
switchport mode access
switchport access vlan 11
left in top of the run conf
and after write mem + reload overwrite parametrs of individual interfaces.
regards Sergiy.
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide