SG350X - possibly weird macro behavior on FW 2.5.8.15
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
01-31-2022 11:34 PM
Hello everyone,
updated a stack of 3 SG350X-48MP last weekend from FW 2.5.7.85 -> 2.5.8.15. Update procedure completed successfully but got caught by the "you cannot login after fw update anymore if your password contains special characters". Therefore carried out the procedure "administrator-password-recovery-for-300-and-500-series" successfully and set a new password without specials characters. Everything OK so far.
By comparing the saved "running configs" (before FW upgrade / after FW upgrade) afterwards I noticed some strange differences. See picture below (left side running-config FW 2.5.7.85 | right side running-config FW 2.5.8.15):
List of installed macros as follows:
#show parser macro brief default interface : ap, no_ap default interface : desktop, no_desktop default interface : guest, no_guest default interface : host, no_host default interface : ip_camera, no_ip_camera default interface : ip_phone, no_ip_phone default interface : ip_phone_desktop, no_ip_phone_desktop default interface : printer, no_printer default interface : router, no_router default interface : server, no_server default interface : switch, no_switch
Firmware as follows
sh ver Active-image: flash://system/images/image_tesla_hybrid_2.5.8.15_release_cisco_signed.bin Version: 2.5.8.15 MD5 Digest: 2e8ebc72af122e80edd3b8989609daa8 Date: 05-Oct-2021 Time: 17:30:57 Inactive-image: flash://system/images/image_tesla_cbs350_hybrid_2.5.7.85_release_cisco_signed.bin Version: 2.5.7.85 MD5 Digest: e766e20b0d080a72db3ec00888d595a0 Date: 18-Jan-2021 Time: 21:15:01
Is there anything I have to worry about? How can I correct the strange macro display / naming. Are the the macro in question applied successful or is there any malfunction to expect now?
Thanks in advance for your effort.
Regards,
Christian
- Labels:
-
Small Business Switches
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
02-01-2022 12:03 AM
looks for me some bug here, if you have a maintenance window,. try no macro save and reload and enable macro and test it?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
02-01-2022 01:41 AM
Hi,
thank you for your suggestion. Unfortunately there is no maintenance window in the near time. The stack is in production.
I had have discovered some more anomalies:
#show macro auto ports SmartPort is Enabled Administrative Globally Auto SmartPort is controlled Operational Globally Auto SmartPort is enabled Interface Auto SmartPort Persistent SmartPort Type Admin State State ----------- ----------------- ----------- ------------------------------- [... other ports removed from output ...] gi3/0/1 disabled enabled default gi3/0/2 enabled enabled default gi3/0/3 enabled enabled default gi3/0/4 enabled enabled unknown gi3/0/5 enabled enabled default gi3/0/6 enabled enabled unknown gi3/0/7 enabled enabled unknown gi3/0/8 enabled enabled unknown gi3/0/9 enabled enabled unknown gi3/0/10 enabled enabled unknown gi3/0/11 enabled enabled unknown gi3/0/12 enabled enabled unknown gi3/0/13 enabled enabled unknown gi3/0/14 enabled enabled default gi3/0/15 enabled enabled default [... other ports removed from output ...]
All ports currently connected to an SNOM IP-Phone are shown in the output above as SmartPort-Type "unknown".
Drilled down to the two ports shown in the running-config of my starting post:
#show macro auto ports ge3/0/6 SmartPort is Enabled Administrative Globally Auto SmartPort is controlled Operational Globally Auto SmartPort is enabled Auto SmartPort is enabled on gi3/0/6 Persistent state is persistent Interface type is unknown No macro has been activated #show macro auto ports ge3/0/7 SmartPort is Enabled Administrative Globally Auto SmartPort is controlled Operational Globally Auto SmartPort is enabled Auto SmartPort is enabled on gi3/0/7 Persistent state is persistent Interface type is unknown No macro has been activated
Note the "Interface type" is "unknown / No macro has been activated".
My hypothesis: the whole thing does not completely blowed up only because of the port-setting "Persistent state is persistent". Therefore the confugration of the VoIP-ports "survived" the (now broken) new firmware only because they were properly configured by the older firmware when a VoIP-phone plugged into the respectively ports and this configuration was/is "sticky" at present time.
Next step I will do if on site: plug in a VoIP-Telephone in an uncofigured port an check if the auto macro ist fired/applied on that specific port.
I have the feeling, my customer is in some danger now losing his ability to communicate with VoIP if something unforseen happening to the switch / infrastructure.
CISCO - any offical thoughts?
Thank you all in advance.
Regards
Christian
