10-06-2016 12:42 AM - edited 03-08-2019 07:42 AM
I need help.
I have a 2960S Switch (Sw-2) connected to 1 port of another 2960S Switch (Sw-1). Both ports are configured as trunk with 3 allowed VLANs (1, 3 & 18). If all ports of the Sw-2 are DISABLED, the ping to this Switch is continuous & no interruption. But if all 9 ports (of this Sw-2 are ENABLED, the ping to Sw-2 is OK but after 15-25 minutes, there will be around 30-40 seconds disconnection (Request Time Out). This is the same situation during the whole day.
I have checked all LAN cables & I tried to isolate every switch port, but there is no problem with all ports & cables.
Below is the configuration of both interface.
SW-1
interface GigabitEthernet1/0/4
switchport trunk allowed vlan 1,3,18
switchport mode trunk
spanning-tree portfast
SW-2
interface GigabitEthernet1/0/23
switchport trunk allowed vlan 1,3,18
switchport mode trunk
spanning-tree portfast
Is there any additional configuration that I need to do to stabilized the connection?
Your support in solving this issue will be appreciated.
Many thanks!
Solved! Go to Solution.
10-06-2016 09:06 PM
Hi Nelson,
Remove "spanning-tree portfast" from the config and then check
We use "spanning-tree portfast" on access ports and not on trunks
10-06-2016 01:01 AM
Hi
take this off should not be on trunk at all its specifically for access ports ,pc phones never use it between trunks it will cause issues
spanning-tree portfast
10-06-2016 10:30 AM
Second what Mark Malone said.
Read on BPDU guard and related packets.
10-06-2016 02:58 PM
If all ports of the Sw-2 are DISABLED, the ping to this Switch is continuous & no interruption. But if all 9 ports (of this Sw-2 are ENABLED, the ping to Sw-2 is OK but after 15-25 minutes, there will be around 30-40 seconds disconnection (Request Time Out).
Duhhhh ... WHAT??? "all 9 ports" are what? Connected to each other in a non-Etherchannel?
WTF! Someone wants to lose their job?
10-06-2016 09:06 PM
Hi Nelson,
Remove "spanning-tree portfast" from the config and then check
We use "spanning-tree portfast" on access ports and not on trunks
10-08-2016 05:01 AM
Hi Nitesh,
I have removed the spanning-tree portfast in all trunk ports but the problem persists.
10-10-2016 12:43 AM
Hi Nelson as per Leos statement are these individual trunks all linked to the same switch , put them into an etherchannel , bundle all the trunks together to avoid STP issues happening , use LACP/PAGAP or just hardcode it on , quick guide below , do you have any topology of the setup you can provide so we can see what way its linked up?
http://www.dummies.com/programming/networking/cisco/etherchannel-configuration/
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide