09-12-2013 05:51 AM - edited 03-07-2019 03:26 PM
I just received my first shipment of 2960X's and am noticing the stack ring speed isn't showing what I would expect. I have (6)
WS-C2960X-48LPD-L in a stack. There are no 2960S' in the stack where it would get downgraded. Here is the output from a few commands...I would expect the Stack Ring Speed to be 80Gbps and the protocol to be FlexStack-Plus.
Switch#sh sw stack-ring speed
Stack Ring Speed : 20G
Stack Ring Configuration: Full
Stack Ring Protocol : FlexStack
Switch#sh sw det
Switch/Stack Mac Address : 7c95.f3ef.1300
H/W Current
Switch# Role Mac Address Priority Version State
----------------------------------------------------------
*1 Master 7c95.f3ef.1300 15 4 Ready
2 Member 5017.fff0.d880 13 4 Ready
3 Member e8ed.f3b3.3880 11 4 Ready
4 Member 5017.ff41.e200 9 4 Ready
5 Member 5017.fff0.eb80 7 4 Ready
6 Member e8ed.f3b3.3600 5 4 Ready
Stack Port Status Neighbors
Switch# Port 1 Port 2 Port 1 Port 2
--------------------------------------------------------
1 Ok Ok 6 2
2 Ok Ok 1 3
3 Ok Ok 2 4
4 Ok Ok 3 5
5 Ok Ok 4 6
6 Ok Ok 5 1
09-12-2013 06:48 AM
20 Gbps is the correct port speed for a homogeneous 2960X stack. Reference.
The 80 Gbps number from the data sheets is "bandwidth" figured in Cisco's marketing way - two rings full duplex means the bandwidth is 4x the port speed.
09-12-2013 06:55 AM
Thats why my pre-sales guy and I figured it was. Marketing speak. You would think that they would say in the show commands that the protocol is actually FlexStack-Plus though!
09-12-2013 07:04 AM
I can't find the presentation right now but there was a similar one on the 3850 that I remember explaining how they came up with the numbers they use to market the stack speed. Probably a partner deep dive session.
Yes, I agree the show command should indicate the "Plus". Maybe you can get the TAC to accept the discrepancy as a cosmetic bug.
Edit - look at BRKARC-3448 on CiscoLive365 re the 3850. Slides 38, 86 and 91 shows how a 40 Gbps port speed translates to "480 Gbps" stack speed. (3 rings eastbound plus 3 rings westbound x 2 due to spatial reuse). I believe the 2960 is similar but with with a single ring eastbound and westbound x 2 for spatial reuse.
Message was edited by: Marvin Rhoads
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide