10-24-2016 06:34 AM - edited 03-10-2019 01:10 PM
Hello Community.
I have a catalyst WS-C4948E-F switch. I was installed as upgrade to catalyst 3560G. I need to upgrade 3560G to have more routing in hardware and 10G port. I’m using a Policy Based Routing, and my configuration does not work without PBR. After I’m enabling PBR on heavy loaded vlan, CPU grow from 5% to 80%. Packets starts to forward in software, command "sh platform health".
My PBR configuration is very simple, it is doc based http://www9.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/switches/lan/catalyst4500/12-2/15-02SG/configuration/guide/config/pbroute.pdf
ip access-list extended LAN-PBR-ACL
permit ip any 10.0.0.0 0.255.255.255
permit ip any 192.168.0.0 0.0.255.255
!
ip access-list extended No-Local-AS-PBR-ACL
permit ip any X.Y.X.0 0.0.0.255
!
route-map Anti-DDOS-RMAP deny 10
match ip address LAN-PBR-ACL
route-map Anti-DDOS-RMAP deny 20
match ip address No-Local-AS-PBR-ACL
route-map Anti-DDOS-RMAP permit 30
set ip next-hop D.DoS.Cleaner.IP
interface Vlan55
ip address X.Y.Z.H
ip policy route-map Anti-DDOS-RMAP
!
sh ver
Cisco IOS Software, Catalyst 4500 L3 Switch Software (cat4500e-ENTSERVICESK9-M), Version 15.2(2)E3, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc3)
Technical Support: http://www.cisco.com/techsupport
Copyright (c) 1986-2015 by Cisco Systems, Inc.
Compiled Wed 26-Aug-15 07:47 by prod_rel_team
ROM: 12.2(44r)SG11
Backbone-SW1 uptime is 3 days, 1 hour, 32 minutes
System returned to ROM by power-on
System restarted at 11:49:08 UTC Fri Oct 21 2016
System image file is "bootflash:cat4500e-entservicesk9-mz.152-2.E3.bin"
Hobgoblin Revision 21, Fortooine Revision 1.40
Last reload reason: power-on
cisco WS-C4948E-F (MPC8548) processor (revision 8) with 1048576K bytes of memory.
.
My question is: is there a HARDWARE base PBR on hi end WS-C4948E-F? Low and 3560G have it in hardware.
Thanks for the help
Solved! Go to Solution.
10-24-2016 03:21 PM
Hi Serhii
"K5CpuMan Review" is the process associated with high-CPU. This indicates that the CPU is involved with the pkt forwarding (You already knew this!) Problem appears to be a software issue, possibly a bug in IOS. If you are open to loading cat4500e-entservicesk9-mz.152-2.E5a.bin and observe, please consider doing so.
If you would like this problem to be further investigated, my recommendation is to consider engaging Cisco via a TAC case. If you need help with opening a TAC case, I will be happy to help.
If you opt to open a TAC case on your own, please provide the following information along with the TAC case:
Sincerely .... Palani
10-24-2016 11:35 AM
Hi Sergiy
Objective seem to be to
Is this correct?
Is the next-hop D.DoS.Cleaner.IP reachable? Do you see a complete ARP entry for this next-hop?
If the next-hop is reachable, please share the output of
Don't expect to see any response for the first two cmds. The above output will give us a deeper idea into where the CPU cycles are spent.
The hw upgrade for 4948E would be WS-X45-SUP7-E or WS-X45-SUP7L-E or WS-C4500X (Fixed chassis).
Kind regards .... Palani
10-24-2016 01:40 PM
Your have understand routing 100% correct.
I have a valid arp/mac of next DDOS-Filter IP.
Yesterday I had the chassis ‘ws-c3560g-48’. Today I have more powerful platform ‘ws-c4948e-f’ 4x10G, 57k routes, 17.5 Mb buffer, dual P/s, PBR available by datasheet. Therefore, I expect that all options will be available, and 3560G config will work fine.
Command OUT in attach
I have found workaround with moving DDOS protected VLAN to different VRF, and leaking routes to each other, but I do not want to leave it forever. I have posted this config alsow, but want to stap back to easy PBR.
Kind regards, Serhii
10-24-2016 03:21 PM
Hi Serhii
"K5CpuMan Review" is the process associated with high-CPU. This indicates that the CPU is involved with the pkt forwarding (You already knew this!) Problem appears to be a software issue, possibly a bug in IOS. If you are open to loading cat4500e-entservicesk9-mz.152-2.E5a.bin and observe, please consider doing so.
If you would like this problem to be further investigated, my recommendation is to consider engaging Cisco via a TAC case. If you need help with opening a TAC case, I will be happy to help.
If you opt to open a TAC case on your own, please provide the following information along with the TAC case:
Sincerely .... Palani
06-09-2017 12:07 AM
Hello!
IOS upgrade solved the problem.
Regards Serhii.
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide