12-05-2012 01:32 AM - edited 03-07-2019 10:24 AM
Hi All
For a remote site we plan to purchase two POE access switches 48 ports 10/100/1000 with stacking options.
I am not confused on selecting between 2960S and 3750 ; any suggestion based on experience
thanks
Vishal
Solved! Go to Solution.
12-05-2012 01:47 AM
Do you want dual power supplies? If yes, then 3750X.
Will you have a stack of switches > 5 units? If yes, then 3750X.
12-05-2012 03:28 AM
Just to build on the main points leolaohoo has already highlighted, the 2960-S series switch will tie you to either 1GbE or 10GbE uplinks. Whereas the 3750-X series switch uses an uplink module, so you can start off using 1GbE fibre and then upgrade the module at a later date in order to facilitate 10GbE fibre or 10GbE copper uplinks. Obviously, 1GbE copper uplinks don't require any uplink module.
The 48-port 2960-S series switch will also tie you to supporting either 24 or 48 simaultaneous 15.4W PoE ports. However, if you don't initially require more than 24 simaultaneous PoE ports, then a 3750-X series switch will enable you to start with the 715W PSU, but add a second PSU later, if required. Alternatively, the 715W PSU can be replaced with a 1100W PSU to simaultaneously support 15.4W PoE across all 48-ports.
Note that Cisco IP phones don't require anything like 15.4W all the time, so in practice the smaller 715W PSU should support more than 24-ports. However, wireless APs are likely to need a bit more than the phones and thin clients will need a lot more than 15.4W (i.e. PoE+).
Stack convergence time is much quicker on the 3750-X series and stack bandwidth is much greater (over 3 times more.)
There are dozens and dozens of other benefits to the 3750-X series. This technical deep dive directly compares the two platforms:
http://www.cisco.com/web/DK/assets/docs/presentations/CVU-juni_X_S-series.pdf
Any other specific requirements?
12-05-2012 01:47 AM
Do you want dual power supplies? If yes, then 3750X.
Will you have a stack of switches > 5 units? If yes, then 3750X.
12-05-2012 03:28 AM
Just to build on the main points leolaohoo has already highlighted, the 2960-S series switch will tie you to either 1GbE or 10GbE uplinks. Whereas the 3750-X series switch uses an uplink module, so you can start off using 1GbE fibre and then upgrade the module at a later date in order to facilitate 10GbE fibre or 10GbE copper uplinks. Obviously, 1GbE copper uplinks don't require any uplink module.
The 48-port 2960-S series switch will also tie you to supporting either 24 or 48 simaultaneous 15.4W PoE ports. However, if you don't initially require more than 24 simaultaneous PoE ports, then a 3750-X series switch will enable you to start with the 715W PSU, but add a second PSU later, if required. Alternatively, the 715W PSU can be replaced with a 1100W PSU to simaultaneously support 15.4W PoE across all 48-ports.
Note that Cisco IP phones don't require anything like 15.4W all the time, so in practice the smaller 715W PSU should support more than 24-ports. However, wireless APs are likely to need a bit more than the phones and thin clients will need a lot more than 15.4W (i.e. PoE+).
Stack convergence time is much quicker on the 3750-X series and stack bandwidth is much greater (over 3 times more.)
There are dozens and dozens of other benefits to the 3750-X series. This technical deep dive directly compares the two platforms:
http://www.cisco.com/web/DK/assets/docs/presentations/CVU-juni_X_S-series.pdf
Any other specific requirements?
12-05-2012 03:57 AM
Thanks a Million to both
12-07-2012 03:48 PM
Vishal,
I sent you a PM.
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide