02-22-2010 12:16 PM - edited 03-06-2019 09:50 AM
Hi!
I'm having problems to analyse the root-cause of the problem listed below.
*Mar 1 00:23:00.144: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface TenGigabitEthernet0/1, changed state to up
*Mar 1 00:23:00.261: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface TenGigabitEthernet0/1, changed state to down
*Mar 1 00:23:02.266: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface TenGigabitEthernet0/1, changed state to up
*Mar 1 00:23:04.782: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface TenGigabitEthernet0/1, changed state to down
*Mar 1 00:23:06.787: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface TenGigabitEthernet0/1, changed state to up
*Mar 1 00:23:08.432: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface TenGigabitEthernet0/1, changed state to down
*Mar 1 00:23:10.436: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface TenGigabitEthernet0/1, changed state to up
*Mar 1 00:23:11.158: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface TenGigabitEthernet0/1, changed state to down
*Mar 1 00:23:13.163: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface TenGigabitEthernet0/1, changed state to up
*Mar 1 00:23:13.926: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface TenGigabitEthernet0/1, changed state to down
*Mar 1 00:23:15.931: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface TenGigabitEthernet0/1, changed state to up
*Mar 1 00:23:17.030: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface TenGigabitEthernet0/1, changed state to down
*Mar 1 00:23:19.035: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface TenGigabitEthernet0/1, changed state to up
ss01.tc2#show idprom interface tenGigabitEthernet 0/1 detail | inc vendor
Transceiver vendor name :CISCO-OPNEXT,INC
Part number provided by transceiver vendor :TRT5024EN-SMC-13
Revision level of part number provided by vendor :01
ss01.tc2#
I'm connecting to a Foundry.
How should I proceed in debugging this scenario?
(And come to the root-cause just like all the nifty CCNA books always tell you to? :-)
GR,
RG
02-22-2010 12:23 PM
Looks like this is not a Cisco part number for the X2. Can you confirm? Who makes it?
Regards,
jerry
02-22-2010 12:31 PM
Hi!
I think I can confirm that.
It's from "New Star Hongkong Networking", it's a X2-10GB-LR Cisco Compatible.
~~
Newstar -X2-10GB-LR 10GBASE-LR X2 - Cisco Compatible
~~
I ordered by them because they could deliver more quickly then my normal supplier.
Should I stick with the Cisco X2 original stuff? (Haven't ordered LR's before... so no experience)
GR,
RG
02-22-2010 12:58 PM
Okay, you are kind of on your own right now. Even though the 3rd party said it is Cisco compatible, Cisco TAC will tell you this is not a certified part.
Have you tried a different one to see if it works? Why you need LR? What is the distance in between? And what is the wave length on the remote end?
Regards,
jerry
02-22-2010 01:05 PM
Hi!
Yeah a 'quick' route with this X2 ends up to not be so quick
The distance is < 300 meters, the LR and fiber-version was however requested by the other party.
You think the RX is too bright (power)?
How could I debug such a situation btw? Link: Up/Down/Up/Down/Up/Down... etc.
(Think I'm gonna give my Cisco supplier a call tomorrow, because this will take too much time anyway)
Btw
The fiber was operational with a LR in a D-link switch "DXS_3326GSR", but I wanted to have everything on Cisco.
This X2 problem is a major bummer though.
GR,
RG
02-22-2010 01:29 PM
Okay, LR is 1310nm and you need single mode fiber. I hope this is what you have. Please check the below link for TX/RX power on the Cisco optic. If you have an optical power meter, check out the power on both end and make sure it is within the spec.
HTH,
jerry
02-23-2010 04:16 PM
Hi!
Your input is well appreciated. Scouting for some other LR's, in the meantime:
*Newsflash*
The LR is working from the Cisco to a D-link switch!
The fiber is working from the D-link switch to the Foundry.
The LR is just not working from the Cisco to the Foundry M8!
But...
if they enable "link-fault-signaling legacy" on their side, my Cisco side stays up?!
Do I have an equal L1 command for Cisco to fix something with link-fault signaling, so that their side also stays up?
GR,
RG
02-23-2010 08:01 PM
I don't think there is any L1 commands for the 6500 platform.
Regards,
jerry
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide