11-25-2013 09:43 AM - edited 03-07-2019 04:46 PM
Hello Cisco experts,
I have configured Cisco C3750X-48TS etherchannel with netapp FAS2240 configured static multi_mode .
interface Port-channel1
description FAS2240
flowcontrol receive on
spanning-tree guard loop
!
interface GigabitEthernet1/0/37
flowcontrol receive on
no cdp enable
spanning-tree guard loop
channel-group 1 mode on
!
interface GigabitEthernet1/0/38
flowcontrol receive on
no cdp enable
spanning-tree guard loop
channel-group 1 mode on
After finish i make a test by transfering bulk data between host to Netapp 2240
and using command :
>ifgrp stat ifgrp01 on netapp. Here is a result from Netapp 2240.
fas2240a*> ifgrp stat ifgro p01
Interface group(trunk) ifgrp01
e0a e0c
Pkts In Pkts Out Pkts In Pkts Out
1458m 738m 1574m 537m
37 0 24257 19488
26 0 29780 24335
21 0 27625 21592
26 0 22600 18088
36 0 26997 21787
29 0 25093 20106
23 0 24649 20462
20 0 27884 22852
33 0 23202 18472
24 0 27121 21215
23 0 23637 18001
21 0 23001 17625
24 0 22984 17725
32 0 22341 17352
21 0 21960 16922
23 0 20662 16444
32 0 18180 13994
25 0 15177 11262
27 0 13175 9078
18 0 13819 9482
31 0 14433 9975
the interface e0a seem doesn't work only e0c has data load on it.
Could you please advice me how to correct my trouble!
Thanks so much!
11-25-2013 09:53 AM
Different switches support different load balancing methods eg. src/dst mac, src/dst IP, src/dst port but the one thing common to etherchannel load balancing is that a single conversation between two devices will always be sent down one specific link. This is what you are seeing ie. at one end you have the netapp device and the other the host. This is a single conversation so it will always use the same physical port in the etherchannel group.
Now lets say you had another host and started a conversation between that host and the netapp device. This is now seen as a different conversation and may well be allocated to the other link.
So what you are seeing is normal behaviour. If you actually needed more than 1Gbps throughput between a specific host and the the netapp device etherchannel is not the solution ie. you would need faster interfaces in the devices.
Jon
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide