cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
1891
Views
0
Helpful
17
Replies

Catalyst 3750X VLAN adding issue

viktar23
Level 1
Level 1

Hi, everyone!

Have two core catalyst 3750X switches in a stack with 15.2(1)E IOS version. When I add VLAN to configuration (doesn't matter what number it is) there is an increase in CPU utilization:

CPU utilization for five seconds: 99%/1%; one minute: 99%; five minutes: 99%
PID Runtime(ms) Invoked uSecs 5Sec 1Min 5Min TTY Process
247 2732742 130875 20880 59.29% 58.81% 58.65% 0 VMATM Callback
159 3503376928 3283516600 0 11.05% 11.62% 11.53% 0 Hulc LED Process
162 786990505 109715445 7173 5.60% 5.18% 5.20% 0 HL3U bkgrd proce

Also all network goes down like in broadcast-storm and on neighbour switches bpduguard is triggered in added VLAN:

%SPANTREE-CLUSTER_MEMBER_13-2-LOOPGUARD_BLOCK: Loop guard blocking port Port-channel1 on VLAN0210.
%SPANTREE-CLUSTER_MEMBER_13-2-LOOPGUARD_UNBLOCK: Loop guard unblocking port Port-channel1 on VLAN0210.
%SPANTREE-CLUSTER_MEMBER_13-2-LOOPGUARD_BLOCK: Loop guard blocking port Port-channel1 on VLAN0210.

But there are no loops on physical topology level. 

Logs on 3750X contain this:

%HLFM-6-ADDR_SYNC: The system is retrying to sync the MAC addresses: reason 2
%HLFM-3-SEND_FAIL: Failed to send RPC message, req 3,
-Traceback= 67945Cz 26880C0z 2D61754z 2D61FECz 2D5EEF0z 2D5F044z 2D5771Cz 2D51C54z
%HLFM-3-SEND_FAIL: Failed to send RPC message, req 3,
-Traceback= 67945Cz 26880C0z 2D61754z 2D61FECz 2D5EEF0z 2D5F044z 2D5
%HLFM-3-SEND_FAIL: Failed to send RPC message, req 3,
-Traceback= 67945Cz 26880C0z 2D61754z 2D61FECz 2D5EEF0z 2D5F044z 2D5771Cz 2D51C54z
%HLFM-3-SEND_FAIL: Failed to send RPC message, req 3,
-Traceback= 67945Cz 26880C0z 2D61754z 2D61FECz 2D5EEF0z 2D5F044z 2D5771Cz 2D51C54z
%HLFM-6-ADDR_SYNC: The system is retrying to sync the MAC addresses: reason 2
%HLFM-3-SEND_FAIL: Failed to send RPC message, req 3,
-Traceback= 67945Cz 26880C0z 2D61754z 2D61Ftopoid 0

No entries in MAC-table in added VLAN.

Switches in a stack functioned in vtp client mode (don't ask why...). I tried to turn them in transparent mode, but that didn't help. Also I tried to replace one useless VLAN (there are 77 VLANs in total) on the new one, but unsuccessfully. Moreover when I returned deleted VLAN in configuration CPU rised to 99% and the same logs appeared in a log buffer.

I found similar problem: https://bst.cisco.com/bugsearch/bug/CSCto85486 and tried to capture BPDU frames with topology change flag. But there is no such traffic in captured dump. Perhaps the problem lies in VP instances. Unfortunately I have no strong knowledges about that and didn't find commands to disable it on 3750X.


Maybe someone have some ideas?

I think it is a software bug and don't know how to solve this problem (organization doesn't have service contract to download new IOS version or start a ticket in Cisco TAC). My last step is just reload the device. Maybe somebody know decision that doesn't require rebooting?

17 Replies 17

Hi again, 
sorry I could not reply because of update.
anyway, 
I see Loop guard not BPDU guard, there are different, also I see PO1? PO1 is portchannel connect to two SW which is stacking.
what is Loop Guard, Loop Guard config in port that receive BPDU, if it not receive BPDU it will go to err-disable, 
so why PO1 not receive BPDU from the other SW ? here the Q.
so 
are you allow VLAN "new one" in trunk of PO1 ?
are you setting  priority for other VLAN different that new VLAN?

note:- I think you can disable Loop Guard for VLAN "per-VLAN config" but I prefer you keep it and config new VLAN to be same as other OLD VLAN. 

Yes, this is actually big quastion. As far as I know loopguard blocks only alternative or backup ports if they don't recieve BPDUs. But PO1 must be root port because there are no other switches connected to this one

1) Yes, new VLAN was added to allowed list

2) Priorities in all VLANs are the same. 

In general, all vlans have the same configuration

 

 

Can you share 

Show etherchannel summary 

Review Cisco Networking for a $25 gift card