cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
2336
Views
0
Helpful
5
Replies

Cisco 2811 high cpu load

Pascal Faucher
Level 1
Level 1

hi,

I'm facing a cpu load issue on cisco 2811.

you can see the configuration, there is nothing extra exhausting for the cpu.

Each time the traffic start to increase, the cpu load increase to 80 or 90% to reach 100%

each time a user start a download  on  for exemple  fa0/1.50  the cpu  increase up to 90%

In the sh process cpu sorted, there is nothing showing that something is wrong.

sh proc cpu sort | excl 0.00

CPU utilization for five seconds: 84%/75%; one minute: 74%; five minutes: 49%

PID Runtime(ms)   Invoked      uSecs   5Sec   1Min   5Min TTY Process

111   131960796 143316176        920  4.59%  4.71%  4.39%   0 IP Input        

177     1767464 342056427          5  0.98%  1.18%  1.19%   0 HQF Shaper Backg

  19     8909968  23942550        372  0.65%  0.57%  0.57%   0 ARP Input       

304      575244  44231492         13  0.32%  0.32%  0.32%   0 PPP manager     

305      407260  44473628          9  0.24%  0.19%  0.18%   0 PPP Events      

268     5208776  20651063        252  0.24%  0.07%  0.08%   0 CCP manager     

   2      124544    286211        435  0.16%  0.16%  0.10%   0 Load Meter      

152       14188     54467        260  0.16%  0.06%  0.02%   0 TCP Protocols   

300      499012   3859685        129  0.16%  0.16%  0.12%   0 IP NAT Ager     

211       37756     28283       1334  0.16%  0.03%  0.05%   0 Crypto Support  

110      251624  43851348          5  0.16%  0.14%  0.14%   0 IP ARP Retry Age

104      252316  43851416          5  0.16%  0.15%  0.16%   0 ACCT Periodic Pr

  42      837160   1446317        578  0.16%  0.16%  0.14%   0 Per-Second Jobs 

145      176976   2185576         80  0.08%  0.08%  0.08%   0 CEF: IPv4 proces

----------------------

CEF is enable on all interface

ICMP unreachables are always sent on all interface

I think but not sure  Trunk with Dot1q interface are not support in CEF

and I think is a switching  problem

---------------------

fa/0/0 is my outgoing interface:

FastEthernet0/0 is up, line protocol is up

  Internet address is x.x.x.x/26

  Broadcast address is 255.255.255.255

  Address determined by non-volatile memory

  MTU is 1500 bytes

  Helper address is not set

  Directed broadcast forwarding is disabled

  Outgoing access list is not set

  Inbound  access list is not set

  Proxy ARP is enabled

  Local Proxy ARP is disabled

  Security level is default

  Split horizon is enabled

  ICMP redirects are never sent

  ICMP unreachables are always sent

  ICMP mask replies are never sent

  IP fast switching is enabled

  IP fast switching on the same interface is disabled

  IP Flow switching is disabled

  IP CEF switching is enabled

  IP CEF switching turbo vector

  IP multicast fast switching is enabled

  IP multicast distributed fast switching is disabled

  IP route-cache flags are Fast, CEF, Full Flow

  Router Discovery is disabled

  IP output packet accounting is disabled

  IP access violation accounting is disabled

  TCP/IP header compression is disabled

  RTP/IP header compression is disabled

  Policy routing is disabled

  Network address translation is enabled, interface in domain outside

  BGP Policy Mapping is disabled

  Input features: Stateful Inspection, Ingress-NetFlow, Virtual Fragment Reassembly, IPSec input classification, NAT Outside, MCI Check

  Output features: CCE Output Classification, Post-routing NAT Outside, Stateful Inspection, IPSec output classification, Firewall (NAT), Firewall (inspect), Post-Ingress-NetFlow, IPSec: to crypto engine, Post-encryption output features

  WCCP Redirect outbound is disabled

  WCCP Redirect inbound is disabled

  WCCP Redirect exclude is disabled

---------------

interface FastEthernet0/0

description WAN-INTERNET

mac-address 0020.40ff.f184

ip address x.x.x.x. 255.255.255.192

no ip redirects

ip flow ingress

ip nat outside

ip virtual-reassembly

load-interval 30

duplex auto

speed auto

crypto map vpnmap

------------------------------

Fa0/1 is a trunk interface with  10 subinterface.

FastEthernet0/1.150 is up, line protocol is up

  Internet address is x.x.x.x/23

  Broadcast address is 255.255.255.255

  Address determined by non-volatile memory

  MTU is 1500 bytes

  Helper address is not set

  Directed broadcast forwarding is disabled

  Outgoing access list is not set

  Inbound  access list is not set

  Proxy ARP is enabled

  Local Proxy ARP is disabled

  Security level is default

  Split horizon is enabled

  ICMP redirects are never sent

  ICMP unreachables are always sent

  ICMP mask replies are never sent

  IP fast switching is enabled

  IP fast switching on the same interface is enabled

  IP Flow switching is disabled

  IP CEF switching is enabled

  IP CEF switching turbo vector

  IP multicast fast switching is enabled

  IP multicast distributed fast switching is disabled

  IP route-cache flags are Fast, CEF, Full Flow

  Router Discovery is disabled

  IP output packet accounting is disabled

  IP access violation accounting is disabled

  TCP/IP header compression is disabled

  RTP/IP header compression is disabled

  Policy routing is disabled

  Network address translation is enabled, interface in domain inside

  BGP Policy Mapping is disabled

  Input features: Stateful Inspection, Ingress-NetFlow, Virtual Fragment Reassembly, MCI Check

  Output features: NAT Inside, Stateful Inspection, Firewall (NAT), Firewall (inspect), Post-Ingress-NetFlow

  WCCP Redirect outbound is disabled

  WCCP Redirect inbound is disabled

  WCCP Redirect exclude is disabled

-----------

interface FastEthernet0/1.150

description LB-MGMT

encapsulation dot1Q 150

ip address x.x.x.x 255.255.254.0

no ip redirects

ip flow ingress

ip nat inside

ip virtual-reassembly

--------------

Any idea how this issue can be resolved

Thanks

Pascal

5 Replies 5

Joseph W. Doherty
Hall of Fame
Hall of Fame

Disclaimer

The    Author of this posting offers the information contained within this    posting without consideration and with the reader's understanding that    there's no implied or expressed suitability or fitness for any  purpose.   Information provided is for informational purposes only and  should not   be construed as rendering professional advice of any kind.  Usage of  this  posting's information is solely at reader's own risk.

Liability Disclaimer

In    no event shall Author be liable for any damages whatsoever  (including,   without limitation, damages for loss of use, data or  profit) arising  out  of the use or inability to use the posting's  information even if  Author  has been advised of the possibility of such  damage.

Posting

A 2811 is a software based router, so as you push traffic through it the CPU has to process it.  I.e. as traffic throughput increase so does CPU load.

Most of the ISRs are oriented for WAN routing, not LAN routing.  The difference being, WAN routing often works with lower bandwidth links than typically found on a LAN.  I recall (?) Cisco's recommendation for the 2811 was no more than dual T1s.  (I've seen a 2811 on a full T3 max its CPU out at about 20 Mbps, duplex.)

Since you're using FastE interface, how much bandwidth are you pushing through the 2811 when you see the CPU load you've documented?

Hi Joseph,

Thanks for your answer, 

Not more than 15Mb and the cpu increase, maybe I should put a 3750 behind for the lan routing  and let the 2811 do wan routing only.

Or maybe a 1941/2901  should do the job or put a 1811,

1811 will do more throughput than the 2811 in the real world because of its much more powerfull processor.

Pascal.

Disclaimer

The Author of this posting offers the information contained within this posting without consideration and with the reader's understanding that there's no implied or expressed suitability or fitness for any purpose. Information provided is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as rendering professional advice of any kind. Usage of this posting's information is solely at reader's own risk.

Liability Disclaimer

In no event shall Author be liable for any damages whatsoever (including, without limitation, damages for loss of use, data or profit) arising out of the use or inability to use the posting's information even if Author has been advised of the possibility of such damage.

Posting

For small LANs with WANs, I often suggest a small L3 switch and a WAN router.

If you're seeing this high CPU at only 15 Mbps, might also be due to other sevices.  Looks to me you might also being doing NAT and VPN.(?)

As to relative performances of the routers you've noted, Cisco lists their performance as:

1811 70 Kpps

2811 120 Kpps

1941 299 Kpps

2901 327 Kpps

Yes

Other service like  VPN and NAT are running.

I'm looking for  1941/2901 , I have around 150pc behind and 20 server  or put 3750G behind and keep my 2811

Disclaimer

The  Author of this posting offers the information contained within this  posting without consideration and with the reader's understanding that  there's no implied or expressed suitability or fitness for any purpose.  Information provided is for informational purposes only and should not  be construed as rendering professional advice of any kind. Usage of this  posting's information is solely at reader's own risk.

Liability Disclaimer

In  no event shall Author be liable for any damages whatsoever (including,  without limitation, damages for loss of use, data or profit) arising out  of the use or inability to use the posting's information even if Author  has been advised of the possibility of such damage.

Posting

The 3750G will only really help if it keeps some traffic from needing to go to the 2811.  If all your 150 PCs and 20 servers on the same subnet, traffic between them doesn't need to be routed.  If they are on different subnets, then a 3750G should support much, much more throughput among them.

Review Cisco Networking products for a $25 gift card