03-29-2018 08:50 AM - edited 03-08-2019 02:27 PM
Hello experts,
We are having strange behavior on one of our networks, it seems related to mac address table and ip arp table but we are not sure yet.
This is a stack of 3750G, they have the L3 routing and the stp root role. The stack is composed by these members:
Switch Ports Model SW Version SW Image
------ ----- ----- ---------- ----------
* 2 12 WS-C3750G-12S 12.2(50)SE2 C3750-IPBASEK9-M
3 24 WS-C3750G-24T 12.2(50)SE2 C3750-IPBASEK9-M
4 24 WS-C3750G-24T 12.2(50)SE2 C3750-IPBASEK9-M
5 28 WS-C3750G-24TS-1U 12.2(50)SE2 C3750-IPBASEK9-M
6 28 WS-C3750G-24TS-1U 12.2(50)SE2 C3750-IPBASEK9-M
Investigating this problem we have issued some show commands, we have discovered non-matching values on used and max values entry on the show below.
SW-C3750# show platform tcam utilization
CAM Utilization for ASIC# 0 Max Used
Masks/Values Masks/values
Unicast mac addresses: 784/6272 152/1136
IPv4 IGMP groups + multicast routes: 144/1152 6/26
IPv4 unicast directly-connected routes: 784/6272 152/1136
IPv4 unicast indirectly-connected routes: 272/2176 24/124
IPv4 policy based routing aces: 0/0 0/0
IPv4 qos aces: 768/768 260/260
IPv4 security aces: 1024/1024 31/31
The following shows may help you to understand the context:
SW-C3750# show mac address-table | inc Total
Total Mac Addresses for this criterion: 942
SW-C3750# show mac address-table count | inc Ava
Total Mac Address Space Available: 4408
SW-C3750# show ip arp summary
1051 IP ARP entries, with 17 of them incomplete
SW-C3750# show sdm prefer
The current template is "desktop default" template.
The selected template optimizes the resources in
the switch to support this level of features for
8 routed interfaces and 1024 VLANs.
number of unicast mac addresses: 6K
number of IPv4 IGMP groups + multicast routes: 1K
number of IPv4 unicast routes: 8K
number of directly-connected IPv4 hosts: 6K
number of indirect IPv4 routes: 2K
number of IPv4 policy based routing aces: 0
number of IPv4/MAC qos aces: 0.5K
number of IPv4/MAC security aces: 1K
Can someone please clarify us if these non-matching values indicates a problem or not?
Many thanks ahead.
Solved! Go to Solution.
03-29-2018 09:04 AM
Hello
Unicast mac addresses: 784/6272 152/1136
you read 152/784 Masks used and 1136/6272 Values
because the TCAM is organized with up to 8 Values/Mask you can run out of Mask before you run out of Values.
the end of the output of show platform tcam utilization:
Note: Allocation of TCAM entries per feature uses a complex algorithm. The above information is meant to provide an abstract view of the current TCAM utilization
I don't see a problem here.
Regards, Guillaume
03-29-2018 09:04 AM
Hello
Unicast mac addresses: 784/6272 152/1136
you read 152/784 Masks used and 1136/6272 Values
because the TCAM is organized with up to 8 Values/Mask you can run out of Mask before you run out of Values.
the end of the output of show platform tcam utilization:
Note: Allocation of TCAM entries per feature uses a complex algorithm. The above information is meant to provide an abstract view of the current TCAM utilization
I don't see a problem here.
Regards, Guillaume
03-29-2018 09:09 AM
Thanks for your explanation Guillame,
It's clear now.
03-29-2018 10:20 AM
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide