cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
3624
Views
0
Helpful
11
Replies

EtherChannel using 2x 10G ports not showing 20G?

Kevin Morales
Level 1
Level 1

Hi, I made a EtherChannel with a Cisco Catalyst 4500, using 2x10 Gbps Interface. but when I check Interface Port-Channel, I see it only show 10 Gbps!.

Show Interface port.png

 

Show interface port-channel.pngshow interfaces description.pngShow modules.pngShow ver.png

 

I attach show version, module, etc.

11 Replies 11

Martin L
VIP
VIP

 

it is looks like a routed port, right? maybe that's normal on L3 POs. 

btw. bandwidth is correct

MTU 1500 bytes, BW 20000000 Kbit/sec, DLY 10 usec

ok!; but the issue I have is when traffic between this Switch and the device in the another side is almost 12 Gbps, the traffic between them get only 5Gbps each interface..

How did you measure only obtaining 5 Gbps per interface?

Kevin,

Even though the total bandwidth shows as 20Gig, a flow can only use one of the physical ports (max 10G) and not 20Gig.

A Portchannel provides link redundancy but not bandwidth aggregation.

HTH

 

 

Hi Reza, Thanks for your answer, but what about this?

 

pch.png

 

Kevin,

So, in that statement "Increased bandwidth" means for example, if you have 2 10Gig links in a Portchannel, the traffic move faster because one flow goes one way and the other flow goes the other way (This is all based on Portchannel hashing algorithm calculation).  Think of 100 cars in a 2 lane highways vs a single highway. With a 2 lane highway, 50 cars can be in each lane and so they can go faster vs if they are all in the same lane, they could be slowed down specially when there is congestion. Portchannle also provide redundancy, which means if you have 2 links in one Portchannel, when one physical link goes down all traffic traverses the other one without or minimum packet loss.

https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/lan-switching/etherchannel/12023-4.html

HTH

The "load balances" mentioned isn't dynamic, i.e. based on link load, it's static, based on traffic attributes and the hashing algorithm.

Worst case all traffic goes to just one link. Best case, over time. flows use all links equally although (especially the older algorithms) the hash algorithms balance best when there's a powers of 2 number of links.

As noted by Reza, one flow will only use one link.

For dual links, the average bandwidth improvement is 50% (over one link).

As to not obtaining 10 g per llnk, much depends on how it's measured (and nature of the traffic and topology factors).

Hi, Joseph W. Doherty, 

 

This is the Port-Channel Interface 20Gbps

P0.png

 

This is one Interface - 10 Gbps, only 

T5-6.png

 

g

T1-1.png

 

 

 

 

 

 

Okay,you're measuring 5 minute averages. The can be not very representative of whether you can obtain full bandwidth utilization.

What you might try is a bandwidth test tool.

What I've done is use such tools to generate about 10% UDP more traffic than you should be able to obtain and see if I can obtain 100% on the other side.

Hi,Kevin,

May I ask you what monitor software you use in these pictures?

It looks great.

Hi, it is Cacti!

Review Cisco Networking for a $25 gift card