01-25-2011 02:53 AM - edited 03-06-2019 03:10 PM
Hello!
My company has recently migrated to MPLS. We have two CPEs in the main site an two in the Disaster site. The provider has configured max-lsa 3000 on its PEs connectint to our network. I have included a diagram of the topology with the name of the routers, so I can more easily explain the problem. The ospf neighborship with router Perseas is torn down, because the provider says that every time adjcacency is accomplished, it is torn down because the max-lsa is exceeded. So, we actually only have 3 circuits running.
The command "sh ip ospf database database-summary" on all four routers shows:
Apollon:
Process 1 database summary
LSA Type Count Delete Maxage
Router 19 0 0
Network 16 0 0
Summary Net 2254 0 0
Summary ASBR 84 0 0
Type-7 Ext 0 0 0
Opaque Link 0 0 0
Opaque Area 0 0 0
Type-5 Ext 2049 0 0
Prefixes redistributed in Type-5 5
Opaque AS 0 0 0
Non-self 3014
Total 4422 0 0
Artemis:
Process 1 database summary
LSA Type Count Delete Maxage
Router 21 0 0
Network 19 0 0
Summary Net 2213 0 0
Summary ASBR 62 0 0
Type-7 Ext 0 0 0
Opaque Link 0 0 0
Opaque Area 0 0 0
Type-5 Ext 2049 0 0
Prefixes redistributed in Type-5 4
Opaque AS 0 0 0
Non-self 3424
Total 4364 0 0
Kassiopi:
Process 1 database summary
LSA Type Count Delete Maxage
Router 17 0 0
Network 17 0 0
Summary Net 1400 0 0
Summary ASBR 45 0 0
Type-7 Ext 0 0 0
Opaque Link 0 0 0
Opaque Area 0 0 0
Type-5 Ext 2049 0 0
Prefixes redistributed in Type-5 0
Opaque AS 0 0 0
Non-self 3058
Total 3528 0 0
Perseas:
Process 1 database summary
LSA Type Count Delete Maxage
Router 15 0 0
Network 16 0 0
Summary Net 956 0 0
Summary ASBR 24 0 0
Type-7 Ext 0 0 0
Opaque Link 0 0 0
Opaque Area 0 0 0
Type-5 Ext 2049 0 0
Prefixes redistributed in Type-5 0
Opaque AS 0 0 0
Non-self 3058
Total 3060 0 0
Questions:
1. If the provider has max-lsa 3000, but the ospf database on all our routers is greater than 3000, why doesn't he tear down all adjacencies? I think that the max-lsa has to do with advertisments incoming to the PEs, that is originating from our network.
2. How can I reduce the size of the database, so that everyone is happy, and everything is still working?
Thanks in advance,
Katerina
01-25-2011 01:39 PM
Hello Katerina,
you have 2049 external routes and this should be investigated
are you using redistribute connected extensively in your network ?
you should move to network commands + passive interface in order to minimize the number of external routes
Your routers can only flood external routes but at area boundary inter area routes can be filtered or summarized and this is what you can do to reduce the number of LSA.
About max-lsa used on PE nodes
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/iproute_ospf/command/reference/iro_osp2.html#wp1012804
the number is that of non locally generated LSAs so the perception of the PE is different in different sites:
when a PE generates an OSPF LSA from a MP BGP VPNv4 route this does not count for the max-lsa limit
on the site where most of the routes are learned from CE max lsa is more effective.
Hope to help
Giuseppe
01-25-2011 10:26 PM
Hello Guiseppe and thank you for your reply!
It is interesting that we have so many external routes! On one of the routers in the topology (ABR) I looked at "show ip ospf database external" (I don't know if this is the correct way to approach the problem - I only new OSPF in theory, now I am diving deeper) and I can see that most of the info comes from the provider (about 2000 entries!!!)
Since we are connected through OSPF area 0 with the provider, it only seems natural to me, that in order to have the same topology we will flood all this info back to him (maybe I am missing something here!)
Since most of the routes are coming from the provider, shouldn't he try to somehow summarize and filter what he is sending, so I don't send it back???
Thanks in advance,
Katerina
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide