cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
299
Views
2
Helpful
6
Replies

Inter-VLAN routing only working one way

gnomish
Level 1
Level 1

I'm trying to get routing working on a Catalyst 3850, but it will only work one way. 

I have the following vlans set up: 

interface Vlan1
 no ip address
 shutdown
!
interface Vlan2
 ip address 192.168.252.24 255.255.255.128
 ip access-group PERMIT in
 ip access-group PERMIT out
!
interface Vlan10
 ip address 192.168.10.254 255.255.255.0
!
interface Vlan12
 ip address 192.168.12.2 255.255.255.0
!

Vlan 10 can reach vlans 2 and 12 no problem.  Vlan 12 cannot reach vlan 10, this is what I am trying to figure out.  I've tried leaving them as is to use the implicit permit rule and tested with explicit permit any any acls on both in and out.  

From a PC on vlan 12 I can ping the switch's ips both vlan 12 and 10, but cannot reach anything else on vlan 10

 

The devices I'm pinging are not windows, so there's no defender firewall issue

1 Accepted Solution

Accepted Solutions

Hell,

 

Do all devices have the correct Default GW for their respective VLAN? Can you also test it by removing the IP ACLS on the VLAN 2. I know you mentioned using permit statements and that should work but would like to see the results when they are removed.

 

-David

View solution in original post

6 Replies 6

gnomish
Level 1
Level 1

Should add: When pinging from vlan 12 I can see the switch adding the device to the arp table if its not there, still times out though

monika_kispal
Level 1
Level 1

Hey.

Have you tried tracing the route?

M02@rt37
VIP
VIP

hello @gnomish 


 

The devices I'm pinging are not windows, so there's no defender firewall issue

 

 So Linux server ? Possible to tcpdump on it and see icmp-echo request ?

Best regards
.ı|ı.ı|ı. If This Helps, Please Rate .ı|ı.ı|ı.

monika_kispal
Level 1
Level 1

You could also use wireshark? Depending on your platforms you could get different but still usable answers from ping and traceroute.

Hell,

 

Do all devices have the correct Default GW for their respective VLAN? Can you also test it by removing the IP ACLS on the VLAN 2. I know you mentioned using permit statements and that should work but would like to see the results when they are removed.

 

-David

gnomish
Level 1
Level 1

Well, I figured out that the device in VLAN10 that I want to reach has to have this switch as a gateway.  (vlan 10 is basically a dmz so the usual gw would be the fw)  Figured that might break icmp replies but didn't think it'd brick all communication.

I'm assuming I could also add a route back to vlan 12 on the fw but that would cause more issues.