IOS release 15.X ????
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
10-03-2009 04:32 AM - edited 03-06-2019 07:59 AM
Trying to figure cisco's new release and why they jumped from 12.X code to 15.X code. What happened to 13 and 14 . :-) I see this out there for the 2800 series now . It's a ED release. It looks like they made 15.X the mainline code for the 12.4T train , wonder why they skipped 13.0 or 14 ? Sounds like they are taking it down to 2 trains either maintenance or T trains , about time they simplified it !!!
c2800nm-spservicesk9-mz.150-1.M.bin
- Labels:
-
Other Switching
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
10-03-2009 06:16 AM
Glen,
I think Cisco IOS developers must be superstitious. I thought they may announce 13 around Halloween.
As for ver 14, apparently that is also an unlucky number in Asia.
Thanks.
Reza
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
10-03-2009 07:57 AM
Correct, 12.4T i moved to 15.X.
There should be releases every 4 months or so.
IOS 15.0 doc:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/partner/products/ps10591/tsd_products_support_series_home.html
The doc with the new features:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/partner/products/ps10591/tsd_products_support_series_home.html
There is also the concept of having 1 IOS image with all featureset on the device running 15.0 and a license will activate either features on the router. So no more need to download and upgrade to another image.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps9677/products_ios_technology_home.html
As far as why no 13 nor 14, no idea. It may come later for main trains, I dont know.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
10-04-2009 02:28 AM
It still looks like there is a bunch of different images you have to choose from adenterprise,ipbase,ipvoice etc... so is the single image in the future still ??? The idea seems like an administrative nightmare a lot of times the actual equipment is ordered by people with lesser networking knowledge and if you are under tight time constraints which you always are this will be a real hassle if the features you need aren't activated.
