12-25-2018 11:20 AM - edited 03-08-2019 04:53 PM
if switch is going to core as fiber from one uplink and copper from another uplink then this design will work or not?
is it proper practice to do that
12-25-2018 12:00 PM
Hello,
only if you want to combine the interfaces into a port channel, they need to be both of the same type. What do you want to accomplish ?
12-25-2018 12:08 PM
What is the use case here, due to ports fully used ? why not use both fibre or copper ?
12-25-2018 08:31 PM
12-26-2018 02:36 PM
As a number of people have mentioned. Yes. This will work. We are likely just very confused. Usually when you have parallel links between two boxes they can both transmit (Tx) and receive (Rx). Would love to help better answer your question. Do you have a picture or a little more on what you are trying to accomplish bigger picture wise?
-Fish
12-26-2018 12:40 PM
Hi @knaik99,
Check this community conversation, I think it will help you:
https://community.cisco.com/t5/switching/mixing-copper-fiber-ports-in-an-etherchannel/td-p/1498121
Regards
12-26-2018 03:04 PM
Are you talking about the amount of members in the channel? You can use any amount from one to the max supported. But using an amount of members that equal to the power of 2 (2,4,8,(16)) gives you the best load distribution on the channel-members.
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide