cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
261
Views
0
Helpful
2
Replies

Legacy "auto qos" versus enhanced "auto qos"

Shaun Michelson
Level 1
Level 1

We have several C3560 switches configured using the "legacy" auto qos settings and a newer C2960S that was configured using the "enhanced" auto qos (auto qos srnd4). I'm wondering if there are any compatibility issues running the two different switch models together with the different auto qos settings? Reason I ask is the people on the newer C2960S switches seem to have a lot of issues with voice quality (using Avaya IP phones), whereas the users on the C3560 switches don't. The users connected to the C2960S switch go through two of the C3560 switches before reaching the PBX.

2 Replies 2

Gordon Ross
Level 9
Level 9

Shouldn't be any real issues. The auto qos macro sets queuing limits for different traffic priorities. It doesn't remark traffic, IIRC.

 

GTG

 

PS - This is probably better answered in the LAN Switching & Routing forum.

Please rate all helpful posts.

Joseph W. Doherty
Hall of Fame
Hall of Fame

Disclaimer

The Author of this posting offers the information contained within this posting without consideration and with the reader's understanding that there's no implied or expressed suitability or fitness for any purpose. Information provided is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as rendering professional advice of any kind. Usage of this posting's information is solely at reader's own risk.

Liability Disclaimer

In no event shall Author be liable for any damages whatsoever (including, without limitation, damages for loss of use, data or profit) arising out of the use or inability to use the posting's information even if Author has been advised of the possibility of such damage.

Posting

The older/earlier/legacy AutoQoS was to support VoIP.  The current(?) SRND4 AutoQoS supports Cisco's 12 class QoS model, which also includes VoIP.  (BTW, the AutoQoS version doesn't depend so much on the vintage of the device as it does on the vintage of the IOS version.)

I'm unsure how the two will intermix.  I suspect both use/expect similar tags for VoIP traffic, but buffer management settings might differ, which could lead to very different VoIP performance, based on your actual traffic mix.

Personally, I've found it better to define your own QoS model, and its supporting device configurations, to meet your QoS goals rather than use the AutoQoS models.  (This also avoids unexpected "surprises" if you upgrade your IOS version.)

I can appreciate the thought using AutoQoS will make a QoS deployment easier, but the time you might need to spend "debugging" what AutoQoS does might be used for building the QoS you need.  (Of course, AutoQoS might work just fine for you too.)

Review Cisco Networking products for a $25 gift card