01-07-2015 07:03 PM - edited 03-07-2019 10:08 PM
Hi,
I think this is just a simple configuration to you fellow engineers. :)
Setup is
SW >> Proxy Server >> ASA
2 physical links, from SW to Proxy Sever, as well as 2 physical links from Proxy Server to ASA.
Before implementing the Proxy Server, the network works fine by just using portchannel from switch to ASA.
But with the proxy server now in the middle, and this proxy server doesn't support link redundancy/etherchannel!, how can we achieve link redundancy?
I'm looking at flex links, but the switch and the ASA have point to point ip addresseses.
(SW using interface vlan, while the FW has portchannel with an ip address)
PLEASE SEE attached image for details.
01-07-2015 07:52 PM
Flax link is a layer-2 technology and as you already know the ASA does not support It.
If the Blue Coat does not support LACP, than just use one link to connect it to both ASA and the switch.
HTH
01-07-2015 08:04 PM
Hi Sir Reza Sharifi for the reply.
Our client doesn't want to have just one link, they purchased additional NIC card for the proxy server just to have link redundancy (yep, poor planning and anticipation),
will there be any other workaround?
01-07-2015 09:59 PM
could this work?
example only.
interface redundant 1
nameif outside
security-level 0
ip address 10.86.194.225 255.255.255.0
member-interface GigabitEthernet0/0
member-interface GigabitEthernet0/2
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide