04-21-2015 04:37 AM - edited 03-07-2019 11:39 PM
Hello,
I'm attempting to migrate a non-backbone normal OSPF area to a NSSA area which is simple enough. However, the challenge is to perform this with zero downtime. Since changing the OSPF stub flags will cause a drop in neighborships and hence a drop in connectivity, I wanted advise on how to best approach this. Please see the diagram attached. The purple routers are connected via a GRE tunnel as they are service provider ASBR routers injecting external routes, and for all other routes the Area 120 routers simply route to the core (Area 0). Hence, area 120 would be more efficient as an NSSA. Is there any way of doing this without losing connectivity?
Kind Regards,
J
Solved! Go to Solution.
04-23-2015 03:18 AM
Yes the new links are to be in the new area. Once you cut your old links, the new links should become operational - fairly seamlessly.
04-21-2015 05:38 AM
If you can get another interface on the links like a SVI, or sub-interface, or GRE tunnel, then you could create the NSSA neighborships along with the existing, once all is up, take away the old OSPF links. There is also an option to physically cable new links in if you have capacity to do so with new IP addressing. A miss-match of area types will tear down an existing ospf neighborship as you have rightly pointed out.
04-21-2015 06:06 AM
Hey,
Many thanks for your reply, much appreciated. So all those edge switches are all configured with SVI's and Port-channels - these all participate in OSPF:
router ospf 1
router-id x.x.x.x
log-adjacency-changes detail
auto-cost reference-bandwidth 1000000
passive-interface default
no passive-interface Vlan1
no passive-interface Vlan322
no passive-interface Port-channel1
network 10.1.40.0 0.0.0.255 area 12
network 10.2.222.0 0.0.0.63 area 12
network 10.3.208.0 0.0.15.255 area 12
network 10.4.239.0 0.0.0.255 area 12
network 10.5.240.0 0.0.0.255 area 12
network 10.6.255.0 0.0.0.255 area 12
So then should I create new SVI's for each corresponding existing SVI on each router. These new SVI's should have IP addresses in the network ranges as in the above network statements but configured under the interface "ip ospf area 13 nssa".
04-21-2015 09:24 AM
Create a new SVI, (new VLAN) - trunk them on the port-channels and trunks, use a different address blocks because you will have conflicting ip address if you assign SVI with IP in same subnet, parser will not allow you to do this by default.
04-23-2015 02:48 AM
Those edge switches are not L2 port-channels but L3 port-channels, hence will I require to provision a new L3 port-channel to each uplink switch with these new interfaces configured in the new area?
interface Port-channel1
description L3 Etherchannel to 6509
no switchport
ip address 10.1.1.1 255.255.255.252
ip ospf network point-to-point
ip ospf hello-interval 2
ip ospf dead-interval 6
logging event trunk-status
logging event bundle-status
end
04-23-2015 03:18 AM
Yes the new links are to be in the new area. Once you cut your old links, the new links should become operational - fairly seamlessly.
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide