06-17-2008 12:48 AM - edited 03-05-2019 11:40 PM
I consider to implement fallback bridging on
a Catalyst 6500 with WS-SUP720-3B (MSFC3+PFC3B).
This is a solution for non-routable (IBM) traffic that
needs to be forwarded between the 6500 VLANs.
I am concerned that the bridging may affect
the performance of the MSFC3 however.
Should I be concerned at all?
What is a safe number for the aggregate bridged
traffic throughput (for MSFC3)?
Any counter-indications for fallback bridging
MSFC3 in general?
Thanks,
Patrick
06-23-2008 07:08 AM
You must configure bridge-groups to do any bridging.Fallback bridging means you are routing IP and bridging the other stuff
(AT, IPX, SNA). Use the vlan-bridge protocol. Eg:
int vlan 10
ip add 10.1.1.1 255.255.255.0
bridge-group 1
bridge 1 protocol vlan-bridge
06-23-2008 09:31 PM
Thanks for your answer.
I did know how to configure it.
My question was about something else:
performance impact on the MSFC.
Anyways, the configuration snippet is
useful for the forum. The best
reference that I found was "Understanding Issues Related to Inter-VLAN
Bridging" :
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk389/tk621/technologies_tech_note09186a00800a7af6.shtml
.
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide