06-28-2019 07:06 AM
Hello,
I am facing the folloing problem: one port in an etherchannel (PAgP) between two c4500 Switche goes suddenly into stand-alone and suspended respectedly, while it was working fine some time ago.
Do you have any suggestion, why the ports are one side suspended and the other side is stand-alone?
Attached you are getting the ports and etherchannel configurations.
regards
Motiar
06-28-2019 07:36 AM
Hello,
the configs look good actually. The only thing that could possibly form a problem is that Cisco recommends to put any storm control only on the port channel interface. So you might want to try to remove:
storm-control broadcast level 5.00 3.00
from all physical interfaces...
07-05-2019 05:50 AM - edited 07-08-2019 06:57 AM
Hi Georg,
Thank you for your advice. I did try to remove to the storm-control from the physical interfaces, but did not work. Finally I took the the following steps and after my two days investment I got the result.
Switch#sh etherch su
Group Port-channel Protocol Ports
------+-------------+-----------+-----------------------
5 Po5(SU) PAgP Gi1/1(s) Gi1/2(P)
7 Po7(SU) PAgP Gi1/1(I) Gi1/2(P)
-------------------
Step 1#
default int ra Gi1/1-2
no int po5 / po7
int ra Gi1/1-2
switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
switchport trunk allowed vlan 300-319
switchport mode trunk
switchport nonegotiate
channel-group 7 mode desirable
channel-protocol pagp
--------------------------------------------
Step 2#
int po5
switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
switchport trunk allowed vlan 300-319
switchport mode trunk
switchport nonegotiate
qos trust dscp
storm-control broadcast level 5.00
------------------------------------------------
Step 3#
int ra Gi1/1-2
tx-queue 1
bandwidth percent 75
tx-queue 2
bandwidth percent 5
tx-queue 3
bandwidth percent 20
priority high
shape percent 20
-------------------------------------------
Switch#sh run int Gi1/1
interface GigabitEthernet1/1
description to PO5
switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
switchport trunk allowed vlan 300-319
switchport mode trunk
switchport nonegotiate
qos trust dscp
storm-control broadcast level 5.00
tx-queue 1
bandwidth percent 75
tx-queue 2
bandwidth percent 5
tx-queue 3
bandwidth percent 20
priority high
shape percent 20
channel-protocol pagp
channel-group 5 mode desirable
Switch#sh etherch su
Group Port-channel Protocol Ports
------+-------------+-----------+-----------------------
5 Po5(SU) PAgP Gi1/1(P) Gi1/2(P)
7 Po7(SU) PAgP Gi1/1(P) Gi1/2(P)
06-28-2019 02:17 PM
@Georg Pauwen agree with him, we have seen many use case strom control shutdown the ports. you can remove and once the port-channel up you can put back if required, it generally not required. (i have seen many traditional one deployed 10years back this config all over).
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide