09-07-2017 06:12 AM - edited 03-08-2019 11:57 AM
09-07-2017 08:12 AM
Hi,
Seeing a proper topology diagram would be very helpful in this case because there are minute details that can be of strong consequence in vPC.
However, in general, shutting down an SVI on one vPC peer while keeping it up on the other vPC peer is an invalid state - in fact, it generates a Type-2 inconsistency. Different platforms may behave differently, but what I have seen happening is that even though the vPC peers continue mutually borrowing their gateway MAC addresses due to peer-gateway, the switch with the disabled SVI will not handle frames for the borrowed MAC address locally, rather, it will have them forwarded through the peer link to the other switch. The other switch might perform routing, but if the packet needs to be sent out another vPC, it will be dropped due to vPC loop prevention mechanism.
Simply put: On vPC peer switches, avoid shutting down a SVI for a vPC VLAN just on one vPC peer. SVI states must match on both vPC peers - either both are up, or both are down, or both do not exist at all. Any other combination will cause trouble.
Best regards,
Peter
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide