05-24-2013 12:43 AM - edited 03-07-2019 01:32 PM
Hi
I have 2 internet connections and I have seprate address pools for these connections. I applied PBR on each interface of switch to route the data based on source ip pool.
When I apply this PBR on interface suddenly latency increses from 2ms to 55ms and sometime echo packets were dropped.
Pool 1 : 101.1.62.0/24
GW: 125.56.2.1
Pool 2 : 202.1.1.0/24
GW: 182.78.9.1
access-list 1 permit 101.0.62.0 0.0.0.255
route-map filter permit 10
match ip address 1
set ip next-hop 125.56.2.1
route-map filter permit 20
set ip next-hop 182.78.9.1
int f0/1
ip polcy route-map filter
05-24-2013 06:05 AM
Hello
Basically at present any traffic that isn't soured from acl1 will be sent to 182.78.9.1- is this what you desire?
Where does this 101.0.62.0 0.0.0.255 network reside?
Also you have no resiliency set in place, so if the next hop interfaces are unreachable your present policy will still try to forward traffic based on the match statements and start arping for the next hop address.
apply set ip next-hp verify-availability to the policy so in this way the router will do a cdp lookup for the next-hop address before policy routing and if not found will instead route normal.
access-list 101 permit icmp101.0.62.0 0.0.0.255 any
access-list 101 permit icmp any 101.0.62.0 0.0.0.255
debug ip policy
debug ip packet 101 detail
res
Paul
Please don't forget to rate any posts that have been helpful.
Thanks.
05-24-2013 08:28 PM
Hi,
Yes any traffic that dosent sourced from acl1 will be sent to 182.78.9.1.
set ip next-hop verify-availability
I entered this command still there is latency problem.
05-25-2013 10:17 AM
Hi Abhijeet,
Please paste 'show ver' from the device.
Regards,
Subeh
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide