04-27-2015 11:25 AM - edited 03-07-2019 11:46 PM
Hi all,
As per my earlier thread of pinging to network ID ->
https://supportforums.cisco.com/discussion/12490926/ping-no-response-found-what-does-it-meant
I am now trying to ping to remote broadcast address (from R1 @ 192.168.3.0/24 to R2 @ 192.168.5.0/24)
q1) where does a network address actually resides ? (e.g. 192.168.5.0 , is it at R2 or R3 or both ?) Why am i able to ping to 192.168.5.0 from R1
q2) on local broadcast 1st, what happen if i send a broadcast from R1 (fe0/0) to 192.168.3.255 ? Does the broadcast still propagates back to R1 fe0/0 ? on it will be only 1 direction and thats to R2 fe0/0.
q3) I am seeing this responses from 3.2 back to 3.1
355 1002.873686000 192.168.3.1 255.255.255.255 ICMP 114 Echo (ping) request id=0x0073, seq=1/256, ttl=255 (no response found!) 356 1002.920564000 192.168.3.2 192.168.3.1 ICMP 114 Echo (ping) reply id=0x0073, seq=1/256, ttl=255 357 1004.889430000 192.168.3.1 255.255.255.255 ICMP 114 Echo (ping) request id=0x0073, seq=2/512, ttl=255 (no response found!) 358 1004.967556000 192.168.3.2 192.168.3.1 ICMP 114 Echo (ping) reply id=0x0073, seq=2/512, ttl=255
- why is it 255.255.255.255 and not 192.168.3.255 ? since i am pinging to this subnet (3.0) broadcast ip (3.255)
- why is there a no respond found in the ping request, but there is still a reply coming from 3.2
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
q4) I have thought routers break up broadcast domain, hence if try to send some information (e.g. ping ) to 192.168.5.255, i should not get any respond. but yet i do and it is coming from 192.168.3.2 !? Why.. (confused)..
R1#ping 192.168.5.255 Type escape sequence to abort. Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 192.168.5.255, timeout is 2 seconds: !!!!! Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 32/51/88 ms Wireshark capture on R2 fe0/0 452 1434.070095000 192.168.3.1 192.168.5.255 ICMP 114 Echo (ping) request id=0x0075, seq=0/0, ttl=255 (no response found!) 453 1434.132596000 192.168.3.2 192.168.3.1 ICMP 114 Echo (ping) reply id=0x0075, seq=0/0, ttl=255 454 1434.195100000 192.168.3.1 192.168.5.255 ICMP 114 Echo (ping) request id=0x0075, seq=1/256, ttl=255 (no response found!) 455 1434.210726000 192.168.3.2 192.168.3.1 ICMP 114 Echo (ping) reply id=0x0075, seq=1/256, ttl=255
I did not turn on ip direct-broadcast on R2fe0/1 and doing a capture on R2 fe0/1 show that there is no outgoing ping packets from 3.1, but why 3.2 is responding to ping to 5.255 ?
Regards,
Noob
04-27-2015 10:11 PM
Hi all,
Any takers :( , is the behavior above normal ? ) to have an interface on 1 side of the router to respond to ping request for another network on another side of the router.
Regards,
Noob
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide