01-04-2007 12:43 PM - edited 03-05-2019 01:35 PM
I need to connect a Netscalar Load Balancer to a Cisco 6500 switch via two ethernet (100Mbps/1Gbps) between them. I will be configuring the two uplink ports using set port channel command on the Cisco side. Due to the load balancer, I also have to configure the two uplink ports with portfast enabled.
Wanted to know if this will cause any loop between the two switches? There are other switch-load balancer connections already configured where both port channel (etherchannel) and portfast are enabled between two uplink ports. But I was not involved when the configuration was made. Please advise. Also, should I configure port channel first, and then enable portfast, or it does not matter in what order I enable the two changes.
Solved! Go to Solution.
01-04-2007 09:40 PM
Hi Friend,
AFAIK it is good to configure port channel first and make them work as a single logical bundle interface so that a single STP instance will run for that bundled interface.
Once its a single bundle interface then you can enable Spanning Tree PORTFAST and it will work fine because after port channel its a single logical interface and one spanning tree instance will work for the same.
HTH
Ankur
*Pls rate helpfull post
01-04-2007 09:40 PM
Hi Friend,
AFAIK it is good to configure port channel first and make them work as a single logical bundle interface so that a single STP instance will run for that bundled interface.
Once its a single bundle interface then you can enable Spanning Tree PORTFAST and it will work fine because after port channel its a single logical interface and one spanning tree instance will work for the same.
HTH
Ankur
*Pls rate helpfull post
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide